We performed a comparison between Microsoft System Center Orchestrator and vCenter Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"The most valuable feature is workflow automation."
"The open, flexible architecture has brought in the agile computing environment along with better Dr capabilities. Automation management and operational tasks across VMware and third-party applications, like our HMIS and other business productivity applications, have delivered peace of mind."
"If I need to do DR, VMware can enable me to use vMotion, which requires use of vCenter. You cannot do vMotion without vCenter. We do a lot of automation, orchestration, and simplification for that purpose."
"The solution is stable."
"It has the best workflow feature."
"We can manage and relocate resources easily."
"The solution was easy to install."
"The product's integration is good, it works well with other programs and solutions."
"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."
"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."
"It could be integrated with third-party hypervisors."
"The price of this product is high and could be improved."
"The solution needs to integrate with Cloud facilities like AWS and Azure."
"I would like to have an interface that can manage both on-premises and cloud solutions from a single console, where we can easily manage the resources that are being used or at least applications. Whereby clicking here and there from on-premises to cloud, or cloud to on-premises, depending on the requirements. If that can be accomplished, it will be extremely beneficial."
"Its technical support team takes a long time to escalate the issues."
"It is practically difficult at this stage to really comment on the improvisations of V central. But more tech events and PoC cases would help the EA to design better solutions and utilization."
"When the SSO certificate needs to be renewed, the upgrading and testing are quite complicated."
"The product lacks GUIs. The tool should have more GUIs available, along with easier product documentation."
More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is ranked 21st in Process Automation with 2 reviews while vCenter Orchestrator is ranked 9th in Process Automation with 45 reviews. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is rated 7.6, while vCenter Orchestrator is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator writes "Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Orchestrator writes "Enables us to do administration on a centralized layer when using multiple VMware ESX servers". Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is most compared with Camunda, Ivanti Automation, OpenText Operations Orchestration, ServiceNow Orchestration and BizTalk Server, whereas vCenter Orchestrator is most compared with VMware Aria Automation, VMware Aria Operations, vCloud Director, Cisco UCS Director and ServiceNow Orchestration. See our Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs. vCenter Orchestrator report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
