"The dashboard, documentation, dossiers are all valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of development in MicroStrategy."
"The dashboard is user-friendly."
"The mobile identity features are great."
"The solution has good analysis features to make sure there's good sizing (so that it's not too big or too small) and allows room for growth if a company needs it."
"The self-service and the dossier components as well as the hyper intelligence."
"Overall, the solution is an easy product to use."
"Good features are the RBAC and UI customization."
"The most valuable feature is the user manager certification that approves or removes user access."
"I have found the OIM Connector framework, based on ICF, to be the most valuable feature."
"It's a stable and scalable solution."
"The proactive controls which can be configured to a granular level allowing the organization the flexibility to meet the changing demands of the workforce."
"It has a very good response time."
"Role-based access control (RBAC) has been crucial for role-based management in my current company. Granular access restrictions based on role-based policies were beneficial."
"Password management is a valuable feature."
"The user interface needs improvement. It needs to be more intuitive."
"Scaling this solution can be difficult."
"Right now, we have to apply many workarounds for the solution to do what we need it to do. There are a lot of bugs."
"In the dossier section, they have something called documents, which is very good, but they are implementing something called dossiers also. If we compare it with the BI tools like Tableau, the canvas which MicroStrategy provides is not that great. The formatting options are limited is dossiers. In terms of formatting and making the reports more presentable, it's lagging a little bit behind."
"The documentation of how to make different connections to different databases needs to be more centralized."
"The skills needed now are very niche and quite low level and they need to simplify the development aspect of it."
"The pricing needs improvement."
"You need full visibility because the suite of features are complex and you have to be clear on what you want to implement."
"The solution should be easy to implement with components combined in one file and built-in features to integrate target applications without having to install additional connectors."
"I would like to see automation in the solution. We need also integration with the Identity Manager. The solution needs to improve in the application integrations part. It also needs to focus on application deployment as well."
"The platform could be enhanced with additional features."
"Our issues with the solution have to do with the integration with different applications. It's not easy to connect ICAO to this kind of product. It would be better to work on the extensions of the adapters for this kind of identity management solution in order to not put in the code in the product."
"Simplify & add more functionality to Identity Cloud Service (IDCS)."
"The solution needs to improve its web interface in the next release."
"The cost of this product needs to be reduced."
Earn 20 points
MicroStrategy Usher is ranked 2nd in Mobile Identity while Oracle Identity Governance is ranked 1st in Mobile Identity with 66 reviews. MicroStrategy Usher is rated 8.4, while Oracle Identity Governance is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of MicroStrategy Usher writes "Excellent security platform for an enterprise setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Identity Governance writes "A scalable solution designed to meet the requirements of medium and large-sized companies". MicroStrategy Usher is most compared with , whereas Oracle Identity Governance is most compared with SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, One Identity Manager, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Saviynt and Microsoft Identity Manager.
See our list of best Mobile Identity vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Identity reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.