We performed a comparison between N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management and TeamViewer Remote Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I'm really happy with the background remote access, which allows me to easily change system internals such as registry keys and silently execute commands using the command prompt in the background. This kind of remote access makes it easy for us to do our jobs without getting in the customer's way."
"I like being able to get a picture of what's happening on a computer. I can just click on it, and I can see the CPU usage and the memory usage and what services and programs are currently running. I can connect remotely to a computer. All these are very useful."
"The solution provides an administration panel where we can see what is happening on our client's stations, such as events, alerts, and all the software installed."
"Remote support has been very handy. It also lets us know if there are failing hard drives or Windows issues."
"The details and the reports they provide are what I like, especially the details for almost the whole computer and the OS type."
"The network device is a good feature. In a place where you need to monitor your firewall switches, you can add an RMM tool and monitor it on the same screen on the same setup for the same client. Network devices are very good."
"The integrated backup and the scripting are good."
"We like that this solution is in real-time, it gives us real-time monitoring."
"The fact that it's user-friendly and it has a chat option. These are my two favorite features."
"The most recent enhancements are quite remarkable."
"The remote access is most valuable."
"TeamViewer Remote Management is easy to use and user-friendly."
"It's considered a trusted application."
"The stability seems to be pretty good so far."
"The user interface is fine."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use. Using this solution enables us to get support easily."
"We haven't had it for very long, and we're finally getting comfortable with it. The biggest improvement probably would be a little more clarification. It has few exclamation points or attention-getters when there is a computer that doesn't have the up-to-date patches, etc. However, it's not specific in terms of what you need to do. Sometimes, it says it requires a reboot, and you reboot it, but the same message still shows up. Sometimes, the messages that it gives you about how to resolve an issue are not very easy to understand."
"There is quite a bit of delay on the portal where we receive monitoring information from the endpoint agent on the remote device. Sometimes it gets stuck with no live response from the device, and you have to refresh the portal just to make sure that it's projecting the right information."
"I would like to see notifications sent with SMS."
"The product looks a bit old-fashioned."
"The alerts and reporting could be done a little more clearly. They are quite cryptic, and quite often, we seem to get a lot of reports just for a computer rebooting or going offline for a couple of minutes, which doesn't seem like it's that big of a deal. Reporting could be refined and improved, and they can make it easy to decipher the reports."
"Kaseya is a similar product and they have easier scripts. If you want to deploy one software to 100 machines, we need to dig into it and then we need to create the script and work with the support team and then we can deploy that particular script. The pre-built scripted is the one thing that I would definitely like to have improved."
"The SentinelOne integration is not great."
"The patch management of the solution could improve."
"One feature to add would be a mobile remote feature."
"There should be an enterprise version of the solution."
"I don't like having so many updates."
"The price for the license could be improved, as well as the setup could be easier."
"Using the solution’s remote connection causes some lagging issues."
"The security of the solution could be more secure."
"I would like to see better pricing, more customization, and increased automation."
"When a user is engaged in a chat on a system with a remote user present, copying the chat content isn't easy."
More N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is ranked 5th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 13 reviews while TeamViewer Remote Management is ranked 3rd in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 33 reviews. N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is rated 8.2, while TeamViewer Remote Management is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management writes "User-friendly and allows you to do different activities on a single interface, and gives you visibility into multiple devices, but its reporting interface and report generation could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer Remote Management writes "Highly stable and scalable solution". N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is most compared with N-able N-central, Zabbix, ConnectWise RMM, NinjaOne and PRTG Network Monitor, whereas TeamViewer Remote Management is most compared with NinjaOne, Azure Bastion, Datto Remote Monitoring and Management and Kaseya VSA. See our N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer Remote Management report.
See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.
We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.