We performed a comparison between Nagios Log Server and Wazuh based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup of Nagios Log Server was easy and straightforward."
"It provides an easy way to identify errors and spot issues, making troubleshooting more efficient."
"The product is scalable."
"A great feature of the solution involves its internal portal."
"One of the most valuable features is the dashboard because the UI was effective and easy to use. The alert systems are good as well. We had no failovers and had high availability. We can search the queries fast as well in Nagios Log Server."
"The MITRE ATT&CK correlation is most valuable."
"It is excellent in terms of visualization and indexing services, making it a powerful tool for malware detection."
"The main thing I like about it is that it has an EDR."
"One of the most beneficial features of Wazuh, particularly in the context of security needs, is the machine learning data handling capability."
"Good for monitoring, active response, and for vulnerabilities."
"The most valuable feature of Wazuh is the ELK for doing an investigation."
"Wazuh is simple to use for PCI compliance."
"I like Wazuh because it is a lot like ELK, which I was already comfortable with, so I didn't have to learn from scratch."
"As we are talking about a product which is open to the public, the pricing makes it challenging for us to profit off of its marketing."
"The customization and dashboards have shortcomings and need to be improved to make the tool look more presentable."
"The support could be better."
"It would be beneficial for Nagios to incorporate a tool that goes beyond log management and includes features to monitor overall system health and assess the effectiveness of antivirus solutions."
"The configurations during initial setup could be improved. If they could be agentless, as in the case of the Ansible product, it would be better. I would like to be able to analyze the network bandwidth."
"Wazuh is missing many things that a typical SIEM should have."
"It would be great if there could be customization for the decoder portion."
"Its configuration process is time-consuming."
"The only challenge we faced with Wazuh was the lack of direct support."
"We would like to see more improvements on the cloud."
"Wazuh needs more security and features, particularly visualization features and a health monitor."
"Adding the flexibility to integrate various plug-ins or modules into its core system would enhance functionality."
"The support team could be more responsive and provide quicker replies during our working hours in Indonesia, which would be a significant improvement."
Nagios Log Server is ranked 40th in Log Management with 5 reviews while Wazuh is ranked 2nd in Log Management with 38 reviews. Nagios Log Server is rated 7.8, while Wazuh is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Nagios Log Server writes "A scalable and affordable tool for monitoring data centers ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wazuh writes "It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services". Nagios Log Server is most compared with Graylog, LogRhythm SIEM, syslog-ng, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server and Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, whereas Wazuh is most compared with Elastic Security, Security Onion, AlienVault OSSIM, Splunk Enterprise Security and Graylog. See our Nagios Log Server vs. Wazuh report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.