NetApp StorageGRID vs Nutanix Unified Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NetApp Logo
3,431 views|2,606 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Nutanix Logo
3,233 views|1,171 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NetApp StorageGRID and Nutanix Unified Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two File and Object Storage solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed NetApp StorageGRID vs. Nutanix Unified Storage Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The feature of StorageGRID that I find most valuable for ensuring data durability and protection is its Information Lifecycle Management functionality.""Right now, we have an older StorageGRID. I like that we can grow it.""The most valuable feature is tiering.""Duplication, interface and the manageability is good and simple.""The implementation with NetApp went smoothly. It is a 'setup and forget' type of appliance.""Cost-effective and easy to deploy.""The speed of the disks removed the bottleneck from our storage.""StorageGRID is designed for cloud-based, highly scalable storage. Think big names like service providers like Google who need massive storage volumes with scalability. It also offers cloud-enabled storage capabilities with cloud management functionality. So, if you prioritize scalability and cloud integration, StorageGRID is the way to go. Its object-based storage is built specifically for that purpose."

More NetApp StorageGRID Pros →

"The real-time alerts generated by this system enable us to swiftly address and mitigate such threats.""It is a highly scalable solution.""The most valuable feature is the unified dashboard, as it allows us to easily observe everything from a single location.""What I like most about Nutanix Files Storage is the way it makes copies of the data. The solution also has high availability, which is excellent. Another valuable feature of Nutanix Files Storage is self-service, so users won't have to depend on the IT team much.""The scalability, ease of use, and technical support are the most valuable features of Nutanix Unified Storage.""Nutanix Unified Storage is easy to use. New employees are able to come up to speed fairly quickly with regard to the day-to-day administration processes.""The Nutanix block files are the most valuable feature.""The inclusion of it in the Nutanix Objects Storage platform simplifies my process as I am no longer required to acquire a separate platform. Instead, I can simply purchase additional licenses as needed. All management can be performed from a single unified interface, making it a convenient and streamlined experience."

More Nutanix Unified Storage Pros →

Cons
"Improvements need to be made in the support area.""I would like to see them integrate more with the monitoring platforms. It is a bit difficult to get automated monitoring of the system.""The integration with more apps has room for improvement.""It has its quirks here and there, but it is an older NetApp system.""The processes around installation and upgrade need improvement.""The redundancy and reliability are great, but I also see room for improvement there. I would like to see more efficiency in the storage and dedupe/compression solutions.""Beyond the initial setup, this product is a little bit difficult to configure.""We want to move towards Azure in the cloud. Right now, the system is all physical."

More NetApp StorageGRID Cons →

"We have had to deal with some infrastructure and general cluster issues but these issues don't impact storage.""The feature request I have is for the consistent improvement of how user account permissions are assigned in Nutanix Unified Storage.""One thing I'd appreciate is having a desktop application similar to what VMware offered.""The implementation is a little bit complex and should be made easier.""I would like to see the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies. That could definitely be a major breakthrough in providing a unified, seamless experience for end-users. It could reduce costs as well as human effort.""Lowering the price would improve this product.""The solution should keep adding new features to be competitive in the market.""If they can add an integrated DLP feature, it would be great."

More Nutanix Unified Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price is attractive."
  • "We chose NetApp because of price and performance."
  • "While we have been able to save money on storage costs, it could be better."
  • "The licensing that the S3 service provides them from a FabricPool standpoint is more attractive than the licensing from AWS or Azure."
  • "We save money on storage costs from this solution since it allows us to have a source of revenue from customers consuming the service."
  • "Creating your own data stores, backups, or storage grids, helps eliminate all these costs of downloading all the data back after you downloaded to the cloud."
  • "Buying the solution is expensive, but it saves you money down the line when you factor in the logistics of not having to buy tapes."
  • "NetApp is not known for being the cheapest storage option on the market. Almost all of the other storage options we looked at were less expensive than StorageGRID. The price is one thing to criticize, which is what we hear internally and from customers as well. They find the cost of the terabytes in this class of storage a little bit higher than expected."
  • More NetApp StorageGRID Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of the license is expensive when comparing it to traditional storage."
  • "I find Nutanix Files Storage competitively priced, even its feature set. Its price is seven out of ten."
  • "If we compare the cost of Nutanix Objects Storage to other solutions such as VMware licenses, our current choice is Nutanix Objects Storage. This solution is more cost-effective. However, adding VMware to Nutanix would not be a cost-efficient decision, which is why we do not use it anymore."
  • "It is quite expensive otherwise as it comes with three-tier peer underlying hardware."
  • "For clients running Nutanix, the licensing cost for Files is a small add-on cost."
  • "With all of the Nutanix equipment, the licensing is expensive. We operate in the enterprise space, but we're a midsized company. At times, the price tag is a little bit shocking for a company with only 35 employees. We're not a Fortune 500 company, but we deal with Fortune 500 drug and energy companies. We have to play in that enterprise space if we're going to have enterprise customers. I'm very price-conscious, but I understand that if I want the best, I've got to pay the price."
  • "It's not the cheapest solution. It's in line with other solutions, but it offers features that the competitors don't have at any price point, especially with regard to analytics and ransomware prevention. No one else has any sort of object-based storage available. Nutanix Unified Storage is a lot more feature-rich. This is a situation where you get what you pay for."
  • "The product is pricey."
  • More Nutanix Unified Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The management portals have most significantly improved our data retrieval times. They've made it much easier to restore data compared to our previous methods.
    Top Answer:The pricing is on the expensive side. I'd rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is expenisve. Our licensing is in INR it was around 25 lakhs, which is roughly two… more »
    Top Answer:Nutanix has excellent product documentation available on their portals, written in simple, easy-to-understand language.
    Top Answer:The pricing is a bit too high. I would like more flexibility.
    Top Answer:From a management side, the one thing I would prefer is if it were a bit less expensive for smaller enterprises. It's a bit costly. If they provided flexible modules where you could pick and choose… more »
    Ranking
    6th
    Views
    3,431
    Comparisons
    2,606
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    672
    Rating
    8.4
    4th
    Views
    3,233
    Comparisons
    1,171
    Reviews
    28
    Average Words per Review
    820
    Rating
    9.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Storage GRID
    Nutanix Files Storage, Nutanix Volumes Block Storage, Nutanix Objects Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Store and manage unstructured data at scale using NetApp StorageGRID for secure, durable object storage. Place content in the right location, at the right time, and on the right storage tier, optimizing workflows and reducing overall costs for globally distributed rich media. 

    Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) is a software-defined storage solution that consolidates seamless access and management of siloed block, file, and object storage into a single platform. Leveraging the Nutanix Cloud Platform, NUS is built for scale, performance, and integrated data security requirements of modern applications deployed on core, cloud, or edge.

    Sample Customers
    ASE, DARZ GmbH
    JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, Volkswagen SAIC, Brighton and Hove City Council, Foresters Financial, Janus International Group, Cloud Comrade, Serco
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider25%
    University13%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization31%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise37%
    Large Enterprise49%
    Buyer's Guide
    NetApp StorageGRID vs. Nutanix Unified Storage
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp StorageGRID vs. Nutanix Unified Storage and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    NetApp StorageGRID is ranked 6th in File and Object Storage with 12 reviews while Nutanix Unified Storage is ranked 4th in File and Object Storage with 39 reviews. NetApp StorageGRID is rated 8.4, while Nutanix Unified Storage is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of NetApp StorageGRID writes "Scalable object storage with robust data durability with efficient geo-distribution and comprehensive lifecycle management ensuring managing of large volumes of unstructured data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Unified Storage writes "Provides good performance, longer uptime, and an easy way to manage our data". NetApp StorageGRID is most compared with MinIO, Dell ECS, Red Hat Ceph Storage, Scality RING and Dell PowerScale (Isilon), whereas Nutanix Unified Storage is most compared with Dell PowerScale (Isilon), Red Hat Ceph Storage, MinIO, Dell ECS and Amazon S3. See our NetApp StorageGRID vs. Nutanix Unified Storage report.

    See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

    We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.