We performed a comparison between OpenNebula and Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."OpenNebula has very good integration with SAP Storage."
"It makes maintenance very easy and stress-free for our teams."
"What's best about OpenNebula that people like is that it's easy to deploy. It's also easy to manage. It's interesting because people choose OpenNebula over other solutions because of the ease of management."
"For the entire data center, as a private cloud, I believe that user management, expert management, and the virtual data center is completely magic for the users."
"The ability to use it almost like a public cloud for an organization is a big asset, as it will create a value proposition and can control costs in a great way."
"OpenNebula is easy to deploy and manage compared to other solutions like OpenStack."
"OpenNebula is lightweight, stable, and easy to customize."
"It is quite easy to deploy."
"From a performance perspective, the management capabilities of the product are very valuable to its customers."
"Advisors provide quick access to Insight and best practice information for performance tuning and configuration."
"The tool is mainly for monitoring databases, especially focusing on performance. It supports various databases, including Oracle, allowing daily activity monitoring. The solution enables displaying performance metrics, providing continuous tracking. It also offers management capabilities for connected databases, featuring graphical performance graphs. Users can perform tasks like killing sessions and controlling database elements. Additionally, it allows viewing tables, SAN disks, and other database components."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control gives us diverse monitoring capability that can be extremely powerful."
"The report feature is very useful."
"If you're using Oracle products, you should definitely use Oracle Enterprise Manager because it is central to product management."
"One of the clearest examples is the agility of discovering processes/sessions that are burdening the database environment. With this agility, the DBA can more quickly verify this type of problem, in addition to checking locked sessions and not having to do several searches in views and tables of the data dictionary. The tool already does this for you in an agile way."
"Another feature is the Resource Manager, where we can manage the consumption of resources of certain queries, separately in resource groups. Depending on the characteristics of the query, queries can be placed in groups that consume less database and hardware resources."
"As with all enterprise software licensing, the pricing is not intuitive and must be negotiated; grandfathered contracts are better than anything offered today."
"The protocol for clusterization is rough and doesn't work well."
"An area for improvement in OpenNebula is the number of features it has. The solution doesn't have that many cloud features compared to other solutions. You'd say, "Okay, simplicity over a rich feature list?" Some say, "No, I need a big machine or a cloud interface for my customers to manage resources. I don't have to go and do it for them." Some people do it that way, and it works, but I'd like to improve the limited features in OpenNebula."
"They should add more features like object storage."
"Backup features are only available in the enterprise edition. The community version lacks a good solution for making backups."
"It should have a simple REST API like most other tools. It's the industry standard format. An XML-RPC API gives you an XML document that you have to convert and then do something with that. REST API endpoint provides outputs in a JSON document. I would also like to see support for user data or heat templates, which OpenStack offers, but OpenNebula doesn't have this yet."
"The storage feature that they have is a bit confusing."
"There are no payment gateways in OpenNebula."
"Adding new databases is difficult in Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control."
"The product does have room for improvement in patch management."
"The configuration is not straightforward for web continuity. It needs some improvement and the deployment is expensive."
"One area where Oracle EMCC could improve is file import flexibility."
"It is sometimes difficult to create configurations in Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control."
"They need to simplify it and make it lighter."
"The initial setup depends on your experience. For example, for people who are doing it for the first time, it's probably difficult."
"While entering the database, there is some delay in viewing the data on the page called SQL monitoring, which reviews live statistics about the current and live queries on the database."
More Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenNebula is ranked 5th in Cloud Management with 14 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is ranked 15th in Cloud Management with 34 reviews. OpenNebula is rated 8.2, while Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenNebula writes "Reliable, simple to manage, and offers great technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control writes "A robust product to deal with application performance enhancemen". OpenNebula is most compared with CloudStack, VMware Aria Automation, Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM), vCloud Director and VMware Aria Operations, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is most compared with AWS Control Tower, VMware Aria Operations, IBM Turbonomic and HPE OneSphere. See our OpenNebula vs. Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control report.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
