We performed a comparison between OpenText Connected MX and Sophos SafeGuard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Sophos, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Mobile Data Protection."The integration features are the most valuable. The integration is specific to each solution. It works well with SQL and Oracle databases and so on."
"The product is easy to use."
"The setup process is straightforward."
"It's easy to use. You have to pay extra for additional, but the basic product is fantastic. It will be a good solution for you, depending on your requirements."
"The malware protection and the scanning features are most valuable in this solution."
"With Sophos, I only need to generate the password and give that to a user to be able to allow them to login to the admin page of the Endpoint and do whatever they need to do. The user cannot go ahead and uninstall it. It's kept us much more secure because of this. Should any event happen on a particular system, I'm given the username and the system IP address. I get notifications and can deal with issues right away."
"I like its ease of use the most. The management console is really nice. I like having one pane of glass that does everything. It does the Sophos anti-virus and encryption. Everything that you need is in one place. It is easy to use, and it is also pretty fast. It provides some pretty good details, and it lets you know who has access to a file. You can also add additional people to the encrypted documents, which is pretty good. Its stability and performance are also very good."
"Policy deployment is easy and quick to do."
"I like the support most of all."
"On the exchange server, you do not have the best options for adjusting your mailbox. This feature is not included. Also, disaster recovery backups can be improved. Some other solutions, such as HP Data Protector, have more features."
"If it's possible, they should make all the features available because it's got a lot of features on offer, but you have to buy the license in order to add those features to the normal Endpoint. If they could make all those features available and/or offer a bundling option it would be better."
"It's a good product, but some are not happy with the boot BCN, and the point-to-point VPN requires the best protection."
"The solution is not using other features like booting encryption, because it causes very heavy processing of the workstation. If they could find some way to handle the encryption and decryption to be lighter on the workstation it would be better."
"The security does not have 100% authentication."
"The Office 360 integration could be improved."
"The focus should be on making things automated ."
"I would like to see a support-cloud, where Sophos creates a single package that contains all of its products."
"The product is not cheap."
Earn 20 points
OpenText Connected MX is ranked 9th in Mobile Data Protection while Sophos SafeGuard is ranked 2nd in Mobile Data Protection with 37 reviews. OpenText Connected MX is rated 10.0, while Sophos SafeGuard is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Connected MX writes "The primary function of it is to back it up off-site so that if you ever have any kind of data corruption, data loss, that you can easily recover that data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos SafeGuard writes "Stable solution that preserves data confidentiality". OpenText Connected MX is most compared with , whereas Sophos SafeGuard is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption, ESET Endpoint Encryption, Cisco Secure Endpoint and McAfee Complete Data Protection.
See our list of best Mobile Data Protection vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Data Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
