OpenText EnCase eDiscovery vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText EnCase eDiscovery and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts. That is one powerful feature that I, personally, love to use.""The technical support is excellent.""It speeds up the process, so I can meet my deadlines.""Data Recovery: Its ability to repair damaged partitions and uncover hidden partitions from within the tool, and allow further analysis.""The solution is very stable.""I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc.""It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts."

More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Pros →

"The threat scanning is excellent. It uses predictive technology and I can utilize attack data to help us fine-tune our systems and network infrastructure. This protects us against current and future attacks.""It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.""The features we have found most valuable have been containment as well as the ability to triage agent activities.""Trellix integrates well with most SIEM and data classification solutions.""The most valuable feature of this solution is its simplicity.""I found the initial setup to be easy.""It has a feature called Isolation. If a device is compromised, we can connect it to our SOC, and no one would be able to access it. This way we can limit the damage to the network while we are investigating.""It is easy to use, flexible, and stable. Because it is a cloud-based solution and it integrates all endpoints of the cloud, we can do an IOC-based search. It can search the entire enterprise and tell us the endpoints that are possibly compromised."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pros →

Cons
"The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better.""We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email.""Ease of use and learning curve need improvement.""​Sometimes the application can take more time to complete the image processing or fail at the end of the process.​""There were minor UI bugs.""I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function.""In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow."

More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Cons →

"I would like to see more automation.""The product is consolidating its portfolio into one product. It is difficult at the moment.""Endpoint resource utilization causes high levels of instability and that is something that needs improvement.""A policy-editing console should be added.""The price of McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve.""One suggestion is they should reduce the constant notifications. Whenever I open my laptop, there are too many notifications from McAfee, and it gets annoying.""From an improvement perspective, I want everything in the solution to be free.""You do not have access to all the features when you use the Trellix web interface. For example, you cannot do device or drive encryption from the web interface. Also, when we're working with customers, it's sometimes challenging to get sales support. Delays mean we might lose an opportunity. Lastly, Trellix lacks some documentation about custom features."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "​The product is affordable and user-friendly.​"
  • "EnCase is an affordable solution."
  • "We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
  • "We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
  • More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."
  • "It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."
  • "The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."
  • "Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."
  • "MVISION is intended as an enterprise product and it is priced like one. This solution is within the price range of competitors at the enterprise level."
  • "Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."
  • "It is based on an annual subscription."
  • "It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."
  • More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:We have experience in engineering and capital projects. It is an add-on to extend project and asset management documentation.
    Top Answer:The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many other… more »
    Top Answer: The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful tool… more »
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 41 in eDiscovery
    Views
    530
    Comparisons
    415
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    343
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    10,320
    Comparisons
    7,656
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    410
    Rating
    7.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    EnCase eDiscovery
    McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
    Learn More
    Overview

    eDiscovery collection tools address the rise in dispersed and remote workforces, the proliferation of mobile devices and new sources of data. Comprehensively collecting data across all data sources, including endpoints, such as desktops and laptops, is critical to defensibility. Collection analytics and culling is key to efficient digital investigations, narrowing the document collection to drive down the cost of legal review.

    With OpenText™ EnCase™ eDiscovery, organizations can streamline the collection, culling and preservation of data across diverse sources in a single efficient process.

    Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response. 

    It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints. 

    ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

    Sample Customers
    Ontario Ministry of Government, Aerospace Company, Chesterfield Police Department
    Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government8%
    Legal Firm8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Government8%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    eDiscovery
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is ranked 6th in eDiscovery with 8 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 19th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 49 reviews. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is rated 7.8, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of OpenText EnCase eDiscovery writes "A stable and scalable hybrid solution with easy setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup". OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is most compared with Nuix eDiscovery, CrowdStrike Falcon and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Open EDR.

    We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.