We performed a comparison between Opsview and SCOM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We use this solution for internal monitoring our own cloud platform because we are a public cloud provider. We also use it for monitoring purposes on behalf of our clients."
"I am satisfied with the overall product since it works well…It is a stable solution."
"What was very compelling about OpsView was that we could dial out the noise and have meaningful and actionable alerts."
"It's a good solution. It covers all aspects of monitoring purposes."
"The most valuable feature of Opsview is the ability to clone the services when you're monitoring something out of the test setup."
"The most valuable feature is the extensibility, as there are really no limits as to what you can do with it."
"The ease of deployment, especially on Windows platforms, is valuable."
"It is a user-friendly product that requires almost no maintenance."
"This solution allows us to standardize all of the reports for monitoring the network, so it helps a lot for auditing purposes."
"The stability has been great."
"The monitoring features are the most valuable. We have seen a major benefit from that so far."
"The tool helps to monitor Windows servers. It offers alerts from a central location."
"This is a product that does more generally than any of the competing solutions."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"Customized reporting can be improved."
"Maybe the graphical representation can be improved. It can be enhanced for better visualization. It could be a little better. And the graph center can be improved."
"Pricing and a few certain aspects in the solution needs to be improved."
"Some of the graphics on Opsview could be improved."
"In a future release, we would like to have Observ for AI. Any AI and intelligence it can add to the monitoring is obviously beneficial. We would also like to have automated callouts."
"The solution’s initial setup is difficult."
"The solution should be more user-friendly and offer a better user interface."
"The solution can be improved by expanding to cloud usage."
"It would be a much better product if Microsoft provided management packs with the product."
"There are some negative points about this product. Sometimes, the capabilities of the software don't appear, and you can't directly see the results. You have to wait for a long period to refresh the policy to push it to the software or other patches."
"In terms of features that could be improved, I would say the agent integration into the operating system. We are having difficulties integrating Linux into some of the networking devices."
"Of course, price is always an issue with Microsoft and could be improved."
"I would like to better be able to monitor Oracle processes."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Opsview is ranked 32nd in Network Monitoring Software with 24 reviews while SCOM is ranked 10th in Network Monitoring Software with 78 reviews. Opsview is rated 8.6, while SCOM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Opsview writes "Responsive and easy to customize alerts for, while being priced similarly to its competition". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". Opsview is most compared with OP5 Monitor, Zabbix, Nagios XI and Instana Infrastructure Monitoring, whereas SCOM is most compared with Dynatrace, Zabbix, Datadog, Nagios XI and AppDynamics. See our Opsview vs. SCOM report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.