We performed a comparison between Oracle Java DB and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The additional value of having Java inside the Oracle database is all the security that is applied to an Oracle database will be enforced on Java's stored procedures as well."
"The most valuable feature is automation."
"The solution is stable."
"It has a programming language so anything that we require for Selenium is all available there."
"It's very clever."
"Able to write queries more efficiently and the management of data has become better and easier."
"There have been no issues in relation to stability. We've never really had do to any recoveries. It is very stable."
"We have found the solution to be customizable and it is beneficial it comes as a bundled package. Additionally, it is user-friendly."
"SAP HANA is vertically and horizontally scalable."
"The solution is stable."
"Using this solution has given us better details for reporting and analytics."
"The performance is very, very good. It's one of the best aspects of the solution."
"The most value for us was in terms of using it to issue tenders online. We host our server, but it is open to the public, so clients who want to buy those tenders were able to go online, put their tender documents up, and we could evaluate them using SAP."
"The performance in terms of processing time is unmatched due to the in-memory processing capability."
"The most valuable feature of SAP HANA is its performance and integration."
"The biggest lesson that I have learned from using Oracle products is vendor lock-in."
"Needs improvement in consistency issues with respect to timeframes."
"The solution should continue to keep updating and improving the Java language."
"It'll be better if Oracle Java supports open source technologies, like Node.js."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"In terms of improvement, I'd like an automation tool that is lower priced. The core prices are very high."
"This is an expensive solution."
"The worst thing about SAP HANA is the price; it's very expensive. The licensing cost, implementation cost, hosting cost, and appliance cost are all high."
"FI, or the financial module of SAP, has room for improvement. It has to have some better localization for the Middle East, especially in regards to taxes and the letter of credit cycle. I would like to see better localization from the HCM."
"The inclusion of a well-performing Time Machine is vital."
"They should develop and improve the solution's data management system."
"The bid process needs to be improved."
"The solution is very expensive, however. The pricing depends on the number of users and many other factors that affect licensing."
"The installation process could be more straightforward."
Oracle Java DB is ranked 23rd in Relational Databases Tools with 7 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 81 reviews. Oracle Java DB is rated 8.2, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Java DB writes "Ability to handle large volumes and data sets but could be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". Oracle Java DB is most compared with MySQL, SQL Server, Apache Derby and Oracle Database, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark. See our Oracle Java DB vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.