We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention and Zscaler DLP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data such as credit card information and personally identifiable information."
"Another important feature is that the solution doesn't require any additional infrastructure to implement. It's a software license that is compatible with our existing hardware. We were able to install and configure the product seamlessly and effortlessly."
"It is a stable solution with good support."
"The setup is very easy as we just need to switch on and switch off."
More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Pros →
"The most valuable aspect of Zscaler Cloud DLP is its automatic DLP feature."
"The product’s most valuable features are data discovery, activity control, and zero trust exchange."
"Zscaler Cloud DLP provides you with basic DLP features that you get out of the box such as keywords, regular expressions, and data identifiers, for example, your social security numbers, and credit card numbers, with everything built into the product, so you can directly use those features within the policies. You don't need to create it from scratch, and to me, this is the biggest benefit of Zscaler Cloud DLP. You have a lot of templates to choose from in the solution, rather than having to create templates from scratch or reinvent templates."
"The solution is the best for storage."
"You can close your data protection gaps with Zscaler. You can quickly find all the classified, sensitive data across the cloud."
"On DLP terms, Zscaler Cloud DLP ensures that data doesn't go outside of the organization. So on the network level, Zscaler does a pretty good job."
"The product’s most valuable features are inbound and outbound scanning and API control."
"As a cloud-based service, it is very easily implemented."
"There is room for improvement in the documentation around the maintenance of the product, how the automatic updates work, and pushing out new policies. A little more detail and context in that area would be helpful."
"Its scalability is not on par with the features of others."
"The solution needs improvement in stability. There has been feedback regarding the accuracy of file categorization."
"You need to have an external solution to backup everything. For example, you need to have Syslog installed on your server as well so that you can back it up to another place."
More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Cons →
"There could be a feature to view the VPN tunnel activities in terms of configuration."
"They should work on a replica account. There could be alerts and replica files sent to the DLP team during data collection."
"We have issues with the tool's maintenance and networking. It should be able to work in offline mode as well."
"On the improvement side, when we bypass certain internet traffic types, it's currently recommended to have a one-click option, but audio and video aren't always supported. Thus, we need to bypass that kind of traffic. So, it is an area of improvement."
"Price-wise, it is a costly product and it should be reduced."
"In the next release, I would like to see RE2 Regex supported."
"There could be additional ways to define proximity. Additionally, they should provide some exclusion options for specific policies and an ability to control the DLP engine."
"The customers would benefit from more robust documentation and conversations around configurations, as it is slightly complex."
More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is ranked 14th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 4 reviews while Zscaler DLP is ranked 4th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 15 reviews. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.6, while Zscaler DLP is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention writes "A solution having automation as one of its strongest points". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler DLP writes "Provides a range of security measures to protect network traffic". Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Cyberhaven, whereas Zscaler DLP is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Varonis Platform and Digital Guardian. See our Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs. Zscaler DLP report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.