We performed a comparison between Picus Security and Verodin based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)."The most valuable feature of Picus Security is its threat intelligence, providing suggestions to block and prevent attacks by identifying malicious files and providing threat IDs."
"One of the most valuable features would be the detection capability, specifically the ability to detect alarms and logs collected from SIEM tools."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration capabilities with the other security tools."
"It's very useful software because the customer mostly configures their IPS and manages their firewalls, WAF, and the DBS according to the latest update, latest news, or according to the situation."
"You have the liberty of physically executing a specific set of rules in your environment."
"The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge."
"The amount of integrations that the product can handle is an area of concern, making it one of the aspects where improvements are required."
"Let's say if a customer's environment has 10 security devices and they need to know that there is an attack that has bypassed their devices, they cannot go and inspect every device and every rule in their security devices."
"The reporting and data analysis could be improved. Specifically, the analysis of the results."
"According to the attack vectors, you cannot specify which product is failing or which product is working well because there's no agent."
"To improve, Picus Security could consider establishing a data center in India to address trust issues and increase interest from Indian customers."
"The integration engine needs to improve."
Earn 20 points
Picus Security is ranked 3rd in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 5 reviews while Verodin is ranked 10th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Picus Security is rated 9.0, while Verodin is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Picus Security writes "A tool with great integration capabilities and a good support team". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Verodin writes "Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine". Picus Security is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach and AttackIQ, whereas Verodin is most compared with AttackIQ, Cymulate, SafeBreach and Pentera.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
