Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs SUSE Rancher comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Sponsored
Ranking in Container Security
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (5th), Cloud and Data Center Security (7th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (6th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (5th), Compliance Management (4th)
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto N...
Ranking in Container Security
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (5th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (1st), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (1st), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (1st)
SUSE Rancher
Ranking in Container Security
32nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Container Security category, the market share of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 2.7% and it increased by 60.7% compared to the previous year. The market share of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is 24.3% and it increased by 17.8% compared to the previous year. The market share of SUSE Rancher is 0.4% and it decreased by 46.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Security
Unique Categories:
Vulnerability Management
1.8%
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
3.1%
Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
16.8%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

KarthikB - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 15, 2024
The solution's agentless vulnerability scanning takes half the work out of it
PingSafe's integration is smooth. They are highly customer-oriented, and the integration went well for us. PingSafe is also responsive to our feature requests. The interface isn't difficult to understand for a layperson, and we're familiar with it. There's also built-in support, so we can get help when we have a problem. The evidence-based reporting is a critical feature because we can correlate to the issues in the system. We have compared it with free tools that are on the market, and PingSafe gets better results. From the perspective of remediation, resources, and security, PingSafe is the best option. The agentless vulnerability scanning has worked well for us. Removing agents from the equation takes about half the work out of it, and the agentless scan fetches the details every millisecond. PingSafe's agentless mechanism is monitoring everything that happens on the system. Proof of exploitability is an important aspect of PingSafe's evidence-based reporting. When we ask a developer to fix an issue, they ask for evidence of its exploitability and whether it's a critical issue. If PingSafe didn't provide this information, we couldn't convince the developer to fix it. PingSafe provides the expertise to convince the developer by finding the vulnerabilities and providing explanations. The infrastructure-as-code scanning helps identify container configuration issues and other problems before they go into production. We used a script, and we needed to enable everything before going to production, so we have it enabled on the production and pre-production side. We can check the issues and block them before going to production. Before it becomes publicly accessible via the internet, we want it to be safer than it was in pre-production.
AR
Dec 4, 2023
Automation and integration capabilities of Prisma have allowed us to save a lot of engineer time
One thing that is missing is Cloud Run runtime security—serverless. That would be great to have in the tool. It's not that easy to have Cloud Run in specific environments. We have also found that Google Security Command Center has a little bit better coverage for GCP because it's native. That's why we pay for both tools. But ideally, we should only need one tool. Prisma Cloud's coverage of GCP is okay, but a little better coverage would be better. Our cloud environment is complex, and Prisma doesn't cover all aspects of it. We don't rely on Prisma for any kind of security discovery. We just rely on it as a control-test and automation tool. We get a few alerts in Prisma, and it allows us to trace any violations back to the source. It's a pretty straightforward interface. Another thing that we have found useful with Prisma is its Jira integration. When our integration finds a new alert, it creates a ticket in Jira, so it's fully visible and tracked, appearing in all the dashboards.
Use SUSE Rancher?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It was reasonable pricing for me."
"Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne is cost-efficient."
"It is not that expensive. There are some tools that are double the cost of PingSafe. It is good on the pricing side."
"The pricing for PingSafe in India was more reasonable than other competitors."
"PingSafe's pricing is good because it provides us with a solution."
"I understand that SentinelOne is a market leader, but the bill we received was astronomical."
"We have an enterprise license. It is affordable. I'm not sure, but I think we pay 150,000 rupees per month."
"The tool is cost-effective."
"The pricing of the solution is fair."
"Prisma Cloud is a value-back cloud-managed solution; cloud-native solutions are quite expensive."
"Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has helped the company save some money. Cost-wise, it's okay."
"Prisma Cloud is more expensive than some other solutions, but when we consider all of its use cases, the cost averages out."
"The cost depends on the pricing model. Compared to other solutions, the cost isn't that bad."
"I don't know a better way to do it, but their licensing is a little confusing. That's due to the breadth of different types of technologies they are trying to cover. The way you license depends on where you're securing. When they were Twistlock it was a simple licensing scheme and you could tell what you were doing. Now that they've changed that scheme with Palo Alto, it is quite confusing. It's very difficult to predict what your costs are going to be as you try to expand coverage."
"Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is a highly expensive solution."
"From my exposure so far, they have been really flexible on whatever your current state is, with a view to what the future state might be. There's no hard sell. They "get" the journey that you're on, and they're trying to help you embrace cloud security, governance, and compliance as you go."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
787,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
5%
Educational Organization
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
When I joined my organization, I saw that PingSafe was already implemented. I started to use the tool's alerting feat...
What is your primary use case for Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks ?
Prisma Cloud helps support DevSecOps methodologies, making those responsibilities easier to manage.
What Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform do you recommend?
We like Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, since it offers us incredible visibility into our entire cloud system. We...
What do you think of Aqua Security vs Prisma Cloud?
Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valu...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

PingSafe
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud, Prisma Public Cloud, RedLock Cloud 360, RedLock, Twistlock, Aporeto
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Amgen, Genpact, Western Asset, Zipongo, Proofpoint, NerdWallet, Axfood, 21st Century Fox, Veeva Systems, Reinsurance Group of America
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Container Security. Updated: June 2024.
787,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.