We performed a comparison between Qualitia Automation Studio and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"We found the initial setup to be straightforward."
"Our platform runs into several thousand screens and a few thousand test cases, something which would typically take months to test manually. As of today, the entire process takes a little over two days to run."
"Selenium WebDriver and Selenium IDE are useful."
"What I like about Selenium HQ is that we wrote it ourselves. I think it's perfect. It's a framework that you can use to devise your own products, which is nice."
"Selenium HQ's most valuable feature is its online community support, which is comprehensive and easy to access."
"The most valuable aspect of Selenium is that it gives you the flexibility to customize or write your own code, your own features, etc. It's not restricted by licensing."
"I have found using IDE and Cucumber framework is good."
"It is more stable in comparison to other solutions because they have quite some experience in the market."
"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
"For people that don't know about technology, maybe it's difficult to use."
"It is not easy to make IE plus Selenium work good as other browsers. Firefox and Chrome are the best ones to work with Selenium."
"For email-based applications, we can't automate as we would like to, making it necessary to bring in a third-party product to do so."
"Selenium has room for improvement as it does not support the tests and result-sharing in anything but a manual way."
"The installation could be simplified, it is a bit difficult to install."
"The login could be improved, to obviate the need for relying on another one for integration with Selenium HQ"
"We'd like to see some more image management in future releases."
"It would be very helpful to be able to write scripts in a GUI, rather than depend so heavily on the command line."
Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 103 reviews. Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Easy to use with great pricing and lots of documentation". Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with OpenText UFT One and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and Automation Anywhere (AA).
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.