We performed a comparison between Qualys VMDR and XM Cyber based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."There are fewer false positives when using this solution."
"The most valuable feature is the connection of threat intelligence information with identified vulnerabilities, which means you can prioritize vulnerabilities according to actual attacks."
"Technical support is great and we've never really had a problem."
"Qualys VM has allowed us to know the vulnerabilities we need to prioritize based on the threat levels and the possible impact if there's an intrusion."
"This solution gives us insight into our environment and improves our security. It helps us to maintain a good patching system whereby we know that XYZ is vulnerable within the system."
"Qualys VM had a recent upgrade and the newer version is supporting the cloud."
"There are many features. Its reliability, ease of installation, ease of use, and the richness of the information provided are the most valuable features."
"It's stable and quite reliable."
"What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable."
"The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation."
"Reports were lacking somewhat on the customization side."
"I do not like that all of the data is stored on the cloud."
"It is more expensive vs. other products on the market."
"Qualys Container Security can improve the interface. It could be easier to navigate and be enriched."
"It is a struggle to be able to pull our report and to be able to do onboarding using automated tools."
"Qualys could be improved in its overall performance compared to other vulnerability management or scanning tools."
"I would like to see this solution more developed and competitive in the Cloud space."
"Qualys does have an on-prem solution, but it is very expensive."
"We'd like to see a cheaper price."
"XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas."
Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews while XM Cyber is ranked 27th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 2 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while XM Cyber is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of XM Cyber writes "Reliable with no false-positives and helpful support". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management, whereas XM Cyber is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach, Picus Security and Orca Security.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.