We performed a comparison between Radware DefenseFlow and Radware DefensePro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, NETSCOUT, Akamai and others in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection."Recently, our company has been facing difficulties due to attacks originating from the Russian Federation. DefenseFlow has proven to be a highly effective solution in protecting our customers."
"The tool's machine learning and artificial intelligence help to prevent attacks by analyzing real-time traffic."
"Radware DefensePro's most valuable feature lies in its ability to mitigate non-traffic attacks."
"The product integrates well with Cisco."
"Technologically simple and effective."
"The important features include automated protection and defense against many attacks, it's important that our networks are protected in the Radware cloud."
"As a service provider, we use the SecOps dashboard feature. That's where we check the time of attacks to see if an attack is happening at the moment or if it has already happened... It is very dynamic and helps us know when an attack occurred, how long it lasted, and what type of attack it was."
"It offers valuable insights into ongoing and past attacks, aiding in post-incident analysis and continuous improvement of our cybersecurity strategy."
"The reporting is very good and provides us with a comprehensive description of where attacks are emanating from."
"A valuable feature is the speed of signature updates."
"Its documentation is not 100% clear, making it the weakest aspect of Radware. We have encountered some difficulties in understanding how to configure it correctly."
"Radware DefenseFlow should add new features and algorithms to make it efficient."
"This solution may not cover all of the requirements in situations for which I am unfamiliar, and there is always room for improvement."
"It would be ideal if they could expand protocol support to cover emerging communication standards and ensure comprehensive protection against diverse attack vectors."
"They should add artificial intelligence to the platform. It is currently missing the machine learning piece."
"We would like to have seven-layer functionality."
"I would like to have more granular steps according to protected bandwidth, so the granularity should be better."
"Right now, we have DefensePro 6. The only complaint I have is that SSL inspection, when activated, consumes a lot of resources on the machine. We are currently reviewing a possible change to DefensePro X, the new version, which has a separate module with its processors."
"I would like to see more focus on layer seven protection."
"APSolute Vision needs to be more granular so that it's possible to get real-time information."
Radware DefenseFlow is ranked 23rd in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 2 reviews while Radware DefensePro is ranked 5th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 23 reviews. Radware DefenseFlow is rated 9.0, while Radware DefensePro is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Radware DefenseFlow writes "A security solution to protect networks with extensive troubleshooting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefensePro writes "Regular signature update with good reporting and analytics". Radware DefenseFlow is most compared with Arbor DDoS, whereas Radware DefensePro is most compared with Arbor DDoS, Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, Fortinet FortiDDoS and Cloudflare DDoS.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.