We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightVM and SecurityScorecard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."There are many integrations with things like the VMware NSX that are great, the reporting is really solid."
"One of the most valuable features is it's graphical dashboard feature. It is quite easy to manage the widgets, and we can customize those according to our queries."
"The remediation project is a pretty effective because it allows us, as clients or countries, to choose specific assets and set limitations on them for a certain period which allows us to track and follow up on those limitations. However, when it comes to real-time monitoring and live dashboards, InsightVM doesn't quite fit the bill. It's not a real-time solution and is not instant."
"The most valuable features are its reporting capabilities and the host discovery functionality."
"I rate InsightVM eight out of 10 for ease of setup. It takes two or three engineers to deploy. The solution requires some maintenance. It's mainly cleaning up data."
"It's easy to use. It's fast, it's a powerful easy to access tool."
"The most valuable feature is the vulnerability scan."
"The performance is good."
"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"The solution should include a tighter integration with third-party threat modeling and threat intelligence tools."
"This solution creates false-positives which can cause issues with reporting."
"InsightVM could be improved by providing passive scanning as an option."
"Reporting could be expanded."
"The integration with other solutions like JIRA could be better. Perhaps there could be some additional updates in the next phase that could integrate with it, so then you can proceed with the VT much easier."
"It would be great to have a mobile application client. Currently, you have to use a mobile web browser on a device, but it is not similar to the desktop web browser in terms of user experience. It would be nice to have a mobile application to access the platform."
"There is room for improvement on its cloud side. In the next release I would like to see better reporting."
"Some of our customers want to be completely cloud based, and Rapid7 doesn't offer this as an option."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews while SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews. Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0, while SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, whereas SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus and Qualys VMDR.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.