Riskonnect vs Thomson Reuters Accelus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Riskonnect Logo
262 views|210 comparisons
Thomson Reuters Logo
348 views|180 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Riskonnect and Thomson Reuters Accelus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC.
To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
25th
out of 87 in GRC
Views
262
Comparisons
210
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
24th
out of 87 in GRC
Views
348
Comparisons
180
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
GRC
May 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: May 2024.
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Accelus
Learn More
Thomson Reuters
Video Not Available
Overview

Riskonnect, Inc. is the only provider of true Integrated Risk Management solutions. Riskonnect is the trusted, preferred source of Integrated Risk Management technology, offering a growing suite of solutions on a world-class cloud computing model that enable clients to elevate their programs for management of all risks across the enterprise. Riskonnect allows organizations to holistically understand, manage and control risks, positively affecting shareholder value.

Riskonnect’s highly configurable technology is ideal for forward-thinking organizations facing increased scrutiny and accountability for corporate governance, strategy and strategic risk. Our solutions facilitate the ability to plan for and respond intelligently to all risks that could potentially harm an organization and its competitive position, damage corporate reputation and/or restrict strategic growth.

Our solutions dynamically connect business transactions, strategy, and operations to the ever-changing regulatory environment, providing highly regulated firms with informed outcomes. Our client groups include compliance, audit, legal and risk functions within the organization. We partner with firms to manage their risk exposure and accelerate their business at every step. In today’s rapidly changing regulatory environment, organizations need to be empowered with tools

that help them navigate the constantly shifting rules, internal business processes, and regulatory

reporting requirements. Thomson Reuters Accelus™ Compliance Management Solutions provide regulatory insight through the ability to identify, map and track regulatory change, process integrity with workflow designed to communicate, test, and audit controls including policies and training, and transparency with capabilities to evidence risk and controls to management and regulators.

Sample Customers
Savage Services, Southwest Airlines, Kaiser Permanente
Fujitsu, NCDOT, Extraco Banks, Qatar National Bank, EY Team
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company13%
Financial Services Firm13%
Construction Company12%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm41%
Comms Service Provider9%
Computer Software Company9%
Real Estate/Law Firm8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise57%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise70%
Buyer's Guide
GRC
May 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: May 2024.
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Riskonnect is ranked 25th in GRC while Thomson Reuters Accelus is ranked 24th in GRC. Riskonnect is rated 0.0, while Thomson Reuters Accelus is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Riskonnect is most compared with RSA Archer and Camms.Risk, whereas Thomson Reuters Accelus is most compared with FIS Protegent.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.