We performed a comparison between Salt Security and Tenable Nessus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Noname Security, Salt Security, F5 and others in API Security."It's really great. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. I haven't encountered any instability issues."
"It allows me to prioritize efforts and utilize effective technical resources."
"The ease of use is the primary valuable feature. This specific version is very straightforward. I like the ability to modify it and configure it based on the different policies."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that you receive the entire report, which details the breakdown, especially in terms of critical, high, low, and mediums."
"The reports are pretty nice and easy to understand."
"Nessus is good at finding out what nodes you have in place. It will then provide you a report, by node, of what the vulnerabilities are. It does it quickly and stealthfully."
"The most valuable feature of Tenable Nessus is the GUI and user-friendliness. Additionally, the environment is easy to work with."
"Tenable Nessus is one of the best vulnerability assessment tools, that I know."
"We have around 500 virtual machines. Therefore, we conduct monthly scans and open tickets for our developers to address identified vulnerabilities. These scans cover the servers, other network equipment, and appliances in our infrastructure."
"The integration part could be a bit extended."
"I would like to have a management option after the network scanning."
"Lacks some penetration testing-related services."
"Online learning could be a bit better."
"There should be a possibility to install agents on scanned machines. Tenable IO provides the capability of using local agents to check local problems, but this feature is not there in Tenable Nessus Professional. It would be nice to have something similar in Tenable Nessus Professional. We should have the capability to use local agents installed on the machines to locally check a problem."
"We'd like to see more integration potential within the solution."
"The report for counters is too simple and would be improved by a dashboard."
"Some things in the user interface could be better. The user interface could allow more adjustments to plugins. The price could also be better."
"The inventory management function in this solution needs improvement."
Salt Security is ranked 2nd in API Security with 1 review while Tenable Nessus is ranked 3rd in Vulnerability Management with 75 reviews. Salt Security is rated 0.0, while Tenable Nessus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Salt Security writes "Provides visibility and control over all APIs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Nessus writes "Unlimited assets for one price and quick, agentless results". Salt Security is most compared with Noname Security, Traceable AI, Wallarm NG WAF, 42Crunch API Security Platform and Imvision, whereas Tenable Nessus is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Tenable Security Center and Pentera.
We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.