We performed a comparison between SAS Enterprise Guide and Trifacta Wrangler Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Alteryx, SAS, Quest Software and others in Data Preparation Tools."The query builder feature is the most valuable."
"An excellent tool for data manipulation and analysis."
"Scheduling downtime of some programs has been eliminated."
"The point and click makes it easy to transfer the knowledge to new employees."
"SAS EG offers many excellent features, such as parallel execution on the same server, controlling output datasets in the process flow, and conditional processing."
"This solution allows for simplified working with large datasets."
"It streamlines our workflow involving multiple steps, from data extraction to modeling, and it is aimed at improving various aspects of banking operations, including customer retention and risk management."
"We are using SAS Enterprise Guide on a basic level and the Pro SQL and other procedures within it are the most useful right now. Additionally, it has a wide feature set and capabilities"
"It works well for data scientists and can really help them drill down on the information in order to give management tangible data points for larger business decisions."
"We don't use SAS Enterprise Guide that much here because we haven't explored some of the statistical modeling capabilities. However, I do not think SAS Enterprise Guide provides all the machine learning features that we want. Those would be separate products from SAS, such as SAS Buyers or any of the other solutions, which will give us the capabilities that we are looking for."
"It is expensive."
"The stability is not very reliable."
"Now that I have experience with Tableau, I think the visualization part of SAS EG could be more user friendly and easier to use. Tableau is very easy to use. It's just does a lot of work by itself, including color schemes. I think that could be incorporated easily into SAS EG, which would make it a much better product. Then you would not need Tableau."
"I had difficulty with the diagrammatic flow chart style representation of projects. When projects got too large and complex (which was basically every project, except the most trivial). There just wasn't enough real estate to display the flow chart and dependencies without a lot of scrolling, even when a flow was down to minimum tasks. My recourse was making the flow less "atomic". E.g., rather than use the various subset, etc., tasks as program nodes to display the details, I would write chunks of code that did a few things and use them as SAS program nodes."
"For some of the advanced functions, you need to learn some SAS code to get what you want."
"I would like to see integration with schedulers when run from hosting environments such as Citrix."
"I would like it to give more information rather than just a forever loop that forces you to shut down the system. Give you more error messages without stopping the entire project, or even the entire application. That it displays more error messages rather than terminating the application."
"This product really needs to improve its ease of use."
Earn 20 points
SAS Enterprise Guide is ranked 2nd in Data Preparation Tools with 24 reviews while Trifacta Wrangler Enterprise is ranked 5th in Data Preparation Tools. SAS Enterprise Guide is rated 8.2, while Trifacta Wrangler Enterprise is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of SAS Enterprise Guide writes "Easy to use, drag and drop interface, with good built-in help facilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trifacta Wrangler Enterprise writes "Robust, great for financial decision making, and very scalable". SAS Enterprise Guide is most compared with Alteryx, Toad Data Point and Altair Monarch, whereas Trifacta Wrangler Enterprise is most compared with Alteryx and Paxata.
See our list of best Data Preparation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Data Preparation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.