We performed a comparison between Savision Live Maps and SCOM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."This helps to centralize multiple monitoring solutions and streamline integration into ITSM."
"The stability has been great."
"The most valuable feature is the extensibility, as there are really no limits as to what you can do with it."
"The tool helps to monitor Windows servers. It offers alerts from a central location."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of Windows and Linux servers."
"This solution saves us a lot of work because it reduces the effort that is required in order to start monitoring."
"The most valuable features in SCOM are Azure monitoring and integration with Azure Monitor for monitoring Azure-hosted servers from SCOM on-premises."
"The most valuable feature of SCOM is real-time alerts."
"It is a user-friendly product that requires almost no maintenance."
"Perhaps more focus can be done on the CMDB portion and bi-directional communication to the ITSM system, but this is a small portion."
"The GI is difficult to work with and the reporting servers are also difficult."
"The console feature is very poor, and it would be very good for us if this were improved."
"There are some negative points about this product. Sometimes, the capabilities of the software don't appear, and you can't directly see the results. You have to wait for a long period to refresh the policy to push it to the software or other patches."
"All of the areas of reporting are very bad and need to be improved."
"On-prem network monitoring is something that could be improved drastically."
"It would be a much better product if Microsoft provided management packs with the product."
"I would like more customized reports. People should have some customization option on the dashboards for whenever they put multiple lists into it. Beyond customizing the content, there should be the ability to customize the colors so that they can engage some priority and mark challenges separately."
"Third-party tools have had to be created to make SCOM management pack creation more efficient and effective. However, this weighs down the application as it just adds a resource requirement, which is ballooning the size of the necessary storage and all that for essentially substandard components."
Earn 20 points
Savision Live Maps is ranked 72nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while SCOM is ranked 3rd in Event Monitoring with 78 reviews. Savision Live Maps is rated 10.0, while SCOM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Savision Live Maps writes "Helpful dashboard, and the ElasticSearch feature helps to identify problematic components". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". Savision Live Maps is most compared with Accedian Skylight, whereas SCOM is most compared with Dynatrace, Zabbix, Datadog, Nagios XI and ServiceNow IT Operations Management.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.