We performed a comparison between SCOM and Statseeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The most valuable feature of SCOM is the capability of using classes within your management pack development."
"The solution is scalable. If you want to monitor more you have to buy more licenses, but you can add on. We don't plan to increase usage."
"The stability has been great."
"It is a user-friendly product that requires almost no maintenance."
"SCOM's most valuable features are the network path feature, reporting, and integration with business intelligence."
"The product’s auto-remediation feature helps with automation."
"SCOM has helped us to monitor all the VMs in our environment, especially the Windows servers."
"Availability monitoring is the feature I have found most valuable, as well as the capacity and ability to send notifications."
"This solution has helped us to proactively identify issues and push some of those fixes down to tier one."
"It also allows us to predict the capacity on WAN circuits, as well as other circuits, to help us plan for upgrading."
"The most valuable features are scalability and reliability."
"If you need a product that's able to monitor all the ports in your environment or all the ports that you want, this is a great product to use. Statseeker is quite flexible in tailoring the product, spending time tailoring the product with you. It's fairly low maintenance. It's quite quick."
"The product simplifies monitoring by providing real-time alerts through a GUI dashboard, email and texts."
"Whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."
"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."
"If somebody is complaining about slow networking then this solution allows us to see various ports to find out whether they are being overloaded."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The initial setup should be easier to complete."
"The solution can be improved by expanding to cloud usage."
"There could be more integration of SIM in the solution."
"The solution should have more tools for monitoring the cloud engine versus on-premise."
"It could use some system enhancements, such as better dashboards."
"Then there is also an issue with capacity and limited space. That is something that needs to be improved."
"The dashboard features are not user-friendly for our management team, only for the technical department."
"Direct integration with third-party tools, like ticketing systems, is lacking but would be beneficial."
"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."
"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."
"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."
"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."
"I would like to see fully automatic updates so that our version is always current."
"We haven't seen an ROI."
"More private MIB object support, such as WAN optimisation performance and wireless, would be helpful."
"There is a little bit of room to improve in the alerting section to give some more options there. It's all I can think of right now off the top of my head."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
SCOM is ranked 10th in Network Monitoring Software with 78 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. SCOM is rated 7.8, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". SCOM is most compared with Dynatrace, Zabbix, Datadog, Nagios XI and AppDynamics, whereas Statseeker is most compared with Fortinet FortiSIEM. See our SCOM vs. Statseeker report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
