We compared SentinelOne Singularity Complete and ThreatLocker Protect based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Based on user reviews, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and ThreatLocker Protect both have strengths in advanced threat detection and customer support. However, while SentinelOne's focus is on comprehensive protection and ease of use, ThreatLocker excels in providing granular control and visibility over file activities. SentinelOne users appreciate the platform's AI technology and user-friendly interface, while ThreatLocker users value its seamless integration with existing systems and effectiveness in preventing unauthorized access. Overall, both products have received positive feedback from users, with SentinelOne standing out for its proactive security measures and ThreatLocker for its granular control features.
Features: SentinelOne Singularity Complete stands out with its comprehensive threat detection, advanced AI, intuitive interface, and swift response to emerging threats. In contrast, ThreatLocker Protect offers advanced threat detection, seamless integration, ease of use, reliable blocking, granular control, and visibility over file activities.
Pricing and ROI: SentinelOne Singularity Complete and ThreatLocker Protect differ in terms of setup cost. Users have expressed their perspectives on the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of both products. While customers have shared insights about the cost-effectiveness and ease of setting up ThreatLocker Protect, opinions on the setup cost of SentinelOne Singularity Complete are also available., The ROI for SentinelOne Singularity Complete is driven by its comprehensive protection, real-time threat detection, and proactive security measures, while ThreatLocker Protect offers significant value and returns by enhancing security, preventing threats, and minimizing potential damages.
Room for Improvement: Users have provided feedback on SentinelOne Singularity Complete that highlights the need for improvements in system performance, user interface, customization options, reporting capabilities, and integration with other security solutions. On the other hand, for ThreatLocker Protect, user feedback specifically focuses on identifying the product's drawbacks.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews for SentinelOne Singularity Complete indicate that the timeframe for deployment and setup are generally the same and should be considered together. However, the user reviews for ThreatLocker Protect highlight the variability in the time required for deployment, setup, and implementation phases., Customer service for SentinelOne Singularity Complete has been positively praised for its prompt and helpful assistance, as well as reliable and efficient support staff. On the other hand, ThreatLocker Protect's customer service also receives high praise for its prompt and helpful assistance, knowledgeable and efficient support team, and commitment to customer satisfaction.
The summary above is based on 148 interviews we conducted recently with SentinelOne Singularity Complete and ThreatLocker Protect users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"This is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"The stability is very good."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"The ability to quickly and easily identify threats on our machines is valuable. The fact that it protects the environment as a whole is also valuable. They have the ability to identify network nodes, and they have Ranger as a component of the solution that allows us to see the whole picture. We can see on what we have SentinelOne and on what we do not."
"It is purely cloud-based, meaning you don't need to have something installed, such as a server on-prem. You have cloud management and can access it from anywhere, with integration with SSO, with one click. It's also very lightweight."
"It has good visibility features and it's straightforward."
"The Deep Visibility feature is the most useful part of the EDR platform. It gives us good insights into what is actually happening on the endpoints, e.g., when we have malicious or suspicious activity. We came from a legacy type AV previously, so we didn't have that level of visibility or understanding. For simplifying threat-hunting, it is extremely useful, where traditional techniques in threat hunting are quite laborious. We can put in indicators of compromise and it will sweep the environment for them, then they would give us a breakdown of what assets have been seen and where they have been seen, which is more of a forensics overview."
"The overview is valuable. There are a lot of instances out there, but Singularity Complete cuts the noise down by giving us graphics and color-coding information instead of massive tech dumps. It helps us concentrate on what is actually needed versus just the noise."
"The EDR functionality of the platform is what we use the most. That was the primary reason why we got SentinelOne. That is what we use the most in terms of functionality."
"It has helped to reduce our organizational risks."
"The strength of SentinelOne is that it has an automated, active EDR. It does that first level of what a SOC analyst would do, automatically, using artificial intelligence, so we can focus on other things. Active EDR not only notifies you, but it actually fixes that first level. That is unheard of. Very few, if any, companies do that."
"We use ThreatLocker's Allowlisting to whitelist specific applications and prevent unauthorized software from running."
"The great thing is that if you get a malicious email and you try to run something, ThreatLocker is not going to let it do anything. It is not going to let anything infect your network."
"The most valuable feature is probably the ability to block programs from running. ThreatLocker has some built-in features that make it super easy. You can also contact their support within the program. If you're having issues, you can click on that button and connect with someone in five to 10 seconds."
"Using ThreatLocker is effortless because I can access it from an app on my phone, so I can help clients after hours. My client had an issue while I was at dinner, and I didn't have a tech on the problem, but I could deal with it from my phone. I can see what the client is doing and approve or deny it. It helps me deliver better service to my clients when they need it."
"While it can be frustrating at times, we appreciate the low-level security provided by the application whitelist."
"Every single feature has been invaluable."
"Application control, ring-fencing, and storage control are the most important features, followed closely by elevation."
"Feature-wise, the learning mode and the fact that it's blocking everything are the most valuable. I don't see why more companies don't use the type of product."
"Detections could be improved."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"There is an area of improvement is agent health monitoring, which would give us the ability to cap and manage resources used by the SentinelOne agent. We had issues with this in our environment. We reached out to SentinelOne about it, and they were very prompt in adding it into their roadmap."
"The solution can improve by adding more granular firewall capabilities."
"It would help if they could get all the relevant threat information, the related events, in one place. Currently, we need to go to a number of places and do research. If they could have it all in one place, that would help investigations."
"The update process can be better. It is very easy to deploy, but over a long period, the updating process can be a little messy. In some EDR solutions, you end up with a very good mechanism to push new versions. It could do with a little work in that area. It is not particularly difficult, but it could do with a little work."
"There is room for improvement with the management interface. It could be more user friendly."
"Ranger does provide me with visibility of the network, but not completely because the assets it scans are often mistakenly identified regarding what type of device they are."
"I'd like to see more documentation."
"We have had cases where Singularity Complete has caused applications to malfunction."
"The snapshots used in the ThreatLocker University portal are outdated snippets and have not been updated in conjunction with the portal itself."
"We identified several areas that we would like to see improved."
"More visibility in the built-ins would be nice."
"ThreatLocker could offer more flexible training, like online or offline classes after hours. The fact that they even provide weekly training makes it seem silly to suggest, but some people can't do it during the day, so they want to train after work. They could also start a podcast about issues they see frequently and what requires attention. A podcast would be helpful to keep us all apprised about what's going on and/or offline training for those people who can't train during the week."
"There are some times when applications get submitted, the hashes don't really line up."
"The reporting could be improved."
"The portal can be a little overwhelming at times from an administration point of view. It displays a lot of information, and it's all useful. However, sometimes there is too much on the screen to sift through, especially if you're trying to diagnose a client's problem with a piece of software. Maybe something has stopped working since they updated it, and we need to see if ThreatLocker is blocking a component of that software."
"Adding applications to the allowlist can sometimes feel overwhelming."
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 177 reviews while ThreatLocker Protect is ranked 26th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 13 reviews. SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.8, while ThreatLocker Protect is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Provides peace of mind and is good at ingesting data and correlating". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatLocker Protect writes "Integration is simple, deployment is straightforward, and extensive well-written documentation is available online". SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Wazuh, whereas ThreatLocker Protect is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Huntress, GravityZone Business Security and Fortinet FortiClient. See our SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. ThreatLocker Protect report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.