We performed a comparison between SentinelOne Singularity Identity and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."All the features within the XDR are valuable as a whole for our organization."
"They have different levels of support. We have the highest level where they are constantly checking all the endpoints. If at any certain point, they identify that a computer has been triggered by a virus, a link, or something else, they would automatically tell us that within 15 seconds. If they notice something, they automatically send us an email saying that they noticed something in the computer, and they are going to block it."
"One of the top things we're interested in is cloud protection."
"Having high visibility into all of our network concerns and a customizable UI are the most valuable features."
"I like the detection and protection features. We don't need to do anything, and it will alert us when the mitigation is not successful. We only need to target those endpoints. Otherwise, we don't have to do anything about that."
"The most valuable feature of SentinelOne Singularity Identity is its ability to detect based on behavior rather than just static signatures."
"Behind the scenes, SentinelOne has real people who evaluate problems and mark them as false positives. That's what I find most helpful."
"The incident and threat logs are great."
"The solution's most valuable feature is providing a single pane of visibility on all the infrastructure and its status."
"The most valuable feature for me is container scanning because I am interested in CICD security."
"One of the most valuable features of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is its exportability, which allows us to conduct risk assessments efficiently."
"It helps us create remediation projects and assign the console’s responsibility to specific engineers."
"The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us."
"Technical support has been good. They respond quite quickly."
"The initial setup is not complex."
"It's a recommended tool for penetration testers because it's effective for that purpose."
"The first-level support has room for improvement."
"A lot of those features came from an acquisition of a different company."
"The resolution turnaround from SentinelOne Singularity Identity's support should be improved."
"The policies could be more precise, and Singularity should use more templates like alternative solutions have. Endpoint management is poor. We cannot manage individual endpoints and must rely on policies, exclusions, or block lists to apply settings to a group instead of the individual agent. If I have to make settings for one computer, I need to create a group, apply the configuration, and move the agent there. It's challenging to manage endpoints that way."
"I don't like SentinelOne's reporting tools. Their reports seem fine theoretically, but the issue is the sample size. For example, it will report that there were four incidents, and that equals 25 percent fewer incidents compared to the previous months. It would be a great improvement if I could expand the range to see reports for the last six months, but it's always one month. That would be an easy thing for them to resolve."
"Sometimes I get kicked out of the console. I don't know why."
"SentinelOne Singularity Identity could be more user-friendly."
"The primary reason for this discontent is that we frequently encounter performance issues with our servers."
"The reporting was never great in Tenable Vulnerability Management, so, in my company, we imported all the data into Ivanti RiskSense to start using it for reporting."
"I don't recommend Tenable.io Vulnerability Management for web scanning"
"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."
"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."
"They need to have more dependable and faster support."
"The solution is a bit slow."
"An area of improvement for this solution is being able to customize the dashboard. For example, the dashboard does not allow us to view a previous months vulnerability results alongside current results to make comparisons."
"The only drawback of the solution is that it is expensive."
More SentinelOne Singularity Identity Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
SentinelOne Singularity Identity is ranked 9th in Vulnerability Management with 14 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. SentinelOne Singularity Identity is rated 8.6, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Identity writes "It offers deep and continuous visibility into our attack surface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". SentinelOne Singularity Identity is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Identity, Qualys VMDR, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Claroty Platform, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management. See our SentinelOne Singularity Identity vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.