We performed a comparison between SolarWinds NPM and StableNet based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The most valuable feature is the graphical user interface."
"I like the tracking feature to track devices and see where they are connected. This is very practical."
"SolarWinds dashboard is very fast. Also, their interface is very good, it looks very user-friendly. The product allows me to see a summary of the network being monitored at a glance."
"The most valuable feature is the way it monitors the environment, and how user-friendly the console is for the end-user. The interface is also very easy and it captures all the information very well."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its graphical interface and reports."
"The set up was very easy. We didn't have any problems with the setup. The deployment took less than an hour."
"It did a good job of the collection and then an investigation of the net flow of information for understanding the applications that were being used at certain locations."
"This solution offers a very good view of our network and allows us to effectively monitor performance."
"The best features are the reporting, utilization, and network graph."
"We can integrate any tool with StableNet."
"The solution is stable."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"SolarWinds NPM needs to increase its elements. One polling engine can only support 10,000 elements then it becomes slow. There are limitations even if you have the full SLX version license."
"There needs to be more integration of widgets, especially for reporting purposes."
"A feature I would ask for is for them to have this solution available for Linux systems instead of Windows."
"If they did some type of synthetic monitoring, it would have been better."
"The price of the solution can be improved."
"It would be nice if SolarWinds added some technical protocols like Modbus. The market needs a simple solution for monitoring a technical device."
"If they could combine everything into one product, that would be very helpful."
"I think Solar Winds NPM needs to create a profile with documentation responsibility."
"The dashboard has a lot of room for improvement."
"The existing dashboard capability is there, but it is not user-friendly."
"The solution is expensive."
SolarWinds NPM is ranked 4th in Network Monitoring Software with 147 reviews while StableNet is ranked 66th in Network Monitoring Software with 3 reviews. SolarWinds NPM is rated 8.2, while StableNet is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of SolarWinds NPM writes "High-level, comprehensive, and proactive monitoring in a user-friendly interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StableNet writes "A highly scalable and stable solution that provides excellent features and can be integrated with any product". SolarWinds NPM is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, ManageEngine OpManager, ThousandEyes and Entuity, whereas StableNet is most compared with . See our SolarWinds NPM vs. StableNet report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.