We performed a comparison between Sophos Cyberoam UTM and Sophos UTM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The user interface is well laid out and understandable."
"It is very easy to use."
"Content filtering, as this enables me to control that which employees can view at different time quotas."
"The most valuable feature of Sophos Cyberoam UTM is the SD-WAN gateway."
"I found that the best feature of Sophos Cyberoam UTM is reporting. Its reporting feature is excellent, fast, and easy to prep and launch."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a very strong product with good support."
"Bandwidth Management and aggregation. It is valuable for combining two ISPs. Switching to a secondary/redundant ISP is thus seamless, in the event that the primary ISP goes down. The Bandwidth Management is also valuable for limiting heavy downloaders that may impact negatively on the experience of other users."
"Its portal is user-friendly. I am able to manage the user data and access control through this device."
"The initial setup has been fine."
"Sophos UTM is very user-friendly and has good integration with other solutions."
"Sophos UTM's best feature is SIM in the cloud, which combines the gateway solution and endpoint solution to send telemetry data to the cloud and provides full contact visibility regarding security."
"It now controls all the security aspects of our web servers with Sophos UTM WAF."
"With over 150 firewalls in our portal, management and monitoring have never been easier."
"It does not take much effort or thinking to understand how it works."
"Technical support is very responsive."
"So far, the solution has been problem-free."
"The product is at its end-of-life. There is nothing to improve as it will be discontinued."
"We have had some issues with technical support, which is an area that needs improvement."
"The solution's pricing could be a problem for some small businesses."
"The technical support response time could be faster."
"There is a lot or room for improvement, because it is still not a fourth or fifth generation firewall. It lacks security features."
"Smaller CR15 units don’t have a hard disc or built in IView software. These units could do with that feature."
"The documentation is not straightforward."
"SD-WAN should be included in the tool."
"The pricing is an issue."
"The lack of import/export functions for network and service options drives me mad."
"There were a lot of features and functionality in Sophos SG UTM but nothing was state of the art in terms of technology. You did not get the latest functions. It was very monolithic as it was based on an old Linux PuTTY system."
"When we call support, we get put on hold for a long time."
"The reporting could improve by providing information on where, or from which device attacks are coming from. We are already given the country where the attack is coming from but more information would be beneficial."
"As it stands right now, when we have an internet failure on WAN1, it takes several minutes before our WAN2 connection picks up the traffic"
"The documentation during the AWS integration was a little fuzzy on getting it to work with how the whole public exposure versus private exposure, then routing some of the traffic."
"VPN needs IKEv2, but it’s in the roadmap. Also, all new, cool features will only come to the new Sophos XG Firewall."
Sophos Cyberoam UTM is ranked 7th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 81 reviews while Sophos UTM is ranked 1st in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 110 reviews. Sophos Cyberoam UTM is rated 8.0, while Sophos UTM is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Sophos Cyberoam UTM writes "Stable and has a straightforward setup; reporting is fast and easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos UTM writes "It's a highly stable platform with very few hardware issues". Sophos Cyberoam UTM is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Secure Firewall, Netgate pfSense, Juniper SRX Series Firewall and SonicWall NSa, whereas Sophos UTM is most compared with Netgate pfSense, Fortinet FortiGate, Sophos XG, OPNsense and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls. See our Sophos Cyberoam UTM vs. Sophos UTM report.
See our list of best Unified Threat Management (UTM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.