We performed a comparison between Tenable Cloud Security and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is advantageous in terms of time-saving and cost reduction."
"The offensive security where they do a fix is valuable. They go to a misconfiguration and provide detailed alerts on what could be there. They also provide a remediation feature where if we give the permission, they can also go and fix the issue."
"The ease of use of the platform is very nice."
"The offensive security feature is valuable because it publicly detects the offensive and vulnerable things present in our domain or applications. It checks any applications with public access. Some of the applications give public access to certain files or are present over a particular domain. It detects and lets us know with evidence. That is quite good. It is protecting our infrastructure quite well."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its storyline, which helps trace an event back to its source, like an email or someone clicking on a link."
"We like the platform and its response time. We also like that its console is user-friendly as well as modern and sleek."
"The most valuable features of PingSafe are cloud misconfiguration, Kubernetes, and IaC scanning."
"The management console is highly intuitive to comprehend and operate."
"The tool alerts us on depreciating performance or deficiencies of our web application. It helps us react on time."
"If you have multi-cloud tenancy using AWS and Azure, you can have a single dashboard where you can onboard all the cloud infrastructure and have visibility into it."
"The product's visibility and remediation work fine for me."
"The solution’s vulnerability management feature has helped us identify and mitigate risks well."
"The key benefit lies in having the largest and most up-to-date database. When it comes to using any Tenable product, it excels in finding vulnerabilities and providing analytics."
"Ermetic can provide super visibility for our cloud environment (we are using AWS)."
"The most valuable feature for me is container scanning because I am interested in CICD security."
"The solution provides seamlessness, a perfect UI, and identity management for office operations. We are most vulnerable to users. Therefore, it is crucial to implement the right solution to ensure proper user access and resource management."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"It helps us create remediation projects and assign the console’s responsibility to specific engineers."
"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."
"A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner."
"It's a recommended tool for penetration testers because it's effective for that purpose."
"The tool has an easy-to-use interface."
"The main area for improvement I want to see is for the platform to become less resource-intensive. Right now, it can slow down processes on the machine, and it would be a massive improvement if it were more lightweight than it currently is."
"The resolution suggestions could be better, and the compliance features could be more customizable for Indian regulations. Overall, the compliance aspects are good. It gives us a comprehensive list, and its feedback is enough to bring us into compliance with regulations, but it doesn't give us the specific objects."
"They could generally give us better comprehensive rules."
"We had a glitch in PingSafe where it fed us false positives in the past."
"There is a bit of a learning curve for new users."
"We wanted it to provide us with something like Claroty Hub in AWS for lateral movement. For example, if an EC2 instance or a virtual machine is compromised in a public subnet based on a particular vulnerability, such as Log4j, we want it to not be able to reach some of our databases. This kind of feature is not supported in PingSafe."
"I would like additional integrations."
"PingSafe filtering has some areas that cause problems, and to achieve single sign-on functionality, a break-glass feature, which is currently unavailable, is necessary."
"I didn't find anything that wasn't useful or needed to be added."
"If Tenable Cloud Security offers a complete Cnapp solution with CWP, CIEM, and Waap security, it will be able to compete with other competitors."
"The product must provide more features."
"There is a need for the support team to improve their response time since it is one of the areas where the product's technical team has certain shortcomings."
"Ermetic needs to improve its security scanning. I would like to see more dynamic graphical forms."
"I do think there might be room for more integrations. This could allow for further customization and flexibility, essentially offering different functionality options to accommodate various budgets."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"The reporting was never great in Tenable Vulnerability Management, so, in my company, we imported all the data into Ivanti RiskSense to start using it for reporting."
"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."
"The solution is a bit slow."
"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."
"The one drawback that we have found is the reports."
"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."
"Users get confused between VPR and CVSS ratings."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Tenable Cloud Security is ranked 15th in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) with 6 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. Tenable Cloud Security is rated 8.6, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Tenable Cloud Security writes "Provides excellent features and helps identify and mitigate risks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Tenable Cloud Security is most compared with Wiz, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Microsoft Defender for Cloud, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management. See our Tenable Cloud Security vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
We monitor all Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
