We performed a comparison between Vade Cloud Core Email Protection and Vade for M365 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, TitanHQ and others in Email Security."Defender for 365 is a comprehensive cloud-based solution. The value of the cloud is that you aren't alone. Threat intelligence and analytics are shared in the cloud. We don't have to find the solution alone. If you face an unknown threat with traditional solutions like Trend Micro and Symantec, you need to open a case and send your information to them to analyze forensically and identify the source of the attack."
"Does a thorough job of examining email and URLs for malicious content."
"The initial setup was easy."
"The risk level notifications are most valuable. We get to know what kind of intrusion or attack is there, and we can fix a problem on time."
"The basic features are okay and I'm satisfied with the Defender."
"The deployment capability is a great feature."
"Some of the valuable features on the email side are anti-phishing, anti-malware, and Safe Links."
"The solution is very easy to use. All you have to do is to assign the license to the end-user and it's done. The customer will only have the feature activated, and the solution will monitor the emails to determine if they are a threat or not."
"The most valuable features of the solution are how the product works against phishing and provides centralization, allowing users to recognize phishing emails."
"It is a stable solution...My company has no worries about the deployment phase of Vade for Office 365."
"Configuration requires going to a lot of places rather than just accessing one tab."
"The company should focus on adding threats that the solution is currently unable to detect."
"The product must provide better malware detection."
"The certification training for Defender for 365 needs to be deeper and incorporate Sentinel. I took all the security courses except one, and Sentinel isn't included."
"They have moved features from one console to another. Things have been moved around in the interface and it takes me time to find where certain features are."
"Microsoft security solutions work as expected. They are constantly updating the solutions to make them better. At the same time, the changes can impact a customer's environment, and we need to adjust settings. Sometimes we aren't aware of the changes, and nothing is pushed from the backend automatically."
"We need to be able to whitelist data at the backend."
"The pre-sales cost calculations could be more transparent."
"Vade Cloud Email Security doesn't provide sandboxing functionality...when a bank needs to exchange or transfer such data, it has to be specific to a certain level of conformity, which I did not see in the tool."
"Concerning a bank, data can be confidential, and when a bank needs to transfer such data, it has to be specific to a certain level of conformity, which I did not see in the product."
More Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Vade Cloud Core Email Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
Vade Cloud Core Email Protection is ranked 45th in Email Security with 1 review while Vade for M365 is ranked 35th in Email Security with 1 review. Vade Cloud Core Email Protection is rated 0.0, while Vade for M365 is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Vade Cloud Core Email Protection writes " A stable and scalable solution to deal with spam and phishing emails". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Vade for M365 writes "A stable tool capable of detecting malware while focusing on anti-phishing to protect its users". Vade Cloud Core Email Protection is most compared with , whereas Vade for M365 is most compared with Fortinet FortiMail, Hornetsecurity Hornet.email, Avanan, Mailinblack and Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP).
See our list of best Email Security vendors and best Email Security vendors.
We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.