We compared VMware Player and VMware Workstation based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Overall, VMware Player is praised for its ease of use, efficient resource utilization, and reliable performance, while VMware Workstation is valued for its seamless virtual machine creation, snapshot functionality, and extensive compatibility with various operating systems. Both products offer unique features tailored to meet different virtualization needs.
Features: VMware Player is praised for its ease of use, seamless virtual machine integration, extensive OS compatibility, efficient resource utilization, and reliable performance. In contrast, VMware Workstation offers seamless VM creation, useful snapshot functionality, and extensive OS compatibility while also being efficient and reliable.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for VMware Player is unknown, as no information is available. Similarly, the setup cost for VMware Workstation is also unknown, as specific information is not provided. The differences in setup cost between the two products cannot be determined based on the available data., The ROI for VMware Player cannot be summarized due to insufficient data. Similarly, the ROI for VMware Workstation is also not provided in the available reviews.
Room for Improvement: VMware Player has areas for improvement based on feedback, while there is no feedback available for improvement on VMware Workstation.
Deployment and customer support: The user feedback for VMware Player does not provide any information or quotes to use as a data source for summarizing the reviews. The review quotes for VMware Workstation also do not contain any information that would allow us to evaluate the duration required for deployment, setup, or implementation., Customer service and support for VMware Player is difficult to assess due to the lack of available information or feedback. Similarly, there is no information or opinions given regarding the customer service and support for VMware Workstation.
The summary above is based on 32 interviews we conducted recently with VMware Player and VMware Workstation users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The solution's technical support team is excellent."
"The most valuable feature of VMware Player is the ability to snapshot with or without memory."
"It's really easy to build testing environments with VMware Player."
"VMware Player's best feature is the ability to run different OS's simultaneously."
"VMware Player helps you to virtualize and install Ubuntu or any other operating system, even on a Windows laptop."
"The most valuable features of VMware Workstation are the DirectX support, you can run Microsoft Hyper-V in virtual environments which is good for me to test different installations. Additionally, you can set up different VLANs, and overall it is a complete solution."
"It is much more mature compared to Nutanix or SimpliVity when it's cross-platform based."
"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable features of the VMware Workstation solutions are the ESXi and vCenter."
"VMware Workstation has tons of third-party support, the largest partner ecosystem. VMware works with a ton of different vendors. They have plugins for almost everything. Other hypervisors lack the flexibility that VMware Workstation offers."
"We can undo some changes using the snapshot feature."
"VMware Workstation allows you to run a virtual machine."
"Technical support is very good."
"When you go to work on a server, it opens up the whole window, and that causes an error inside VMware Player."
"The tool has limited scalability."
"VMware Player should provide a cloud version with no limitations to hardware resources."
"Its networking features need improvement."
"VMware Player isn't downgradable, so if you have a later set of VMs, you need to upgrade it or figure out a workaround."
"I need to buy a newer version of the tool to support Windows Server."
"The big issue that we've always had with VMware, was the disparity between what was presented for a Windows-based client and a Linux-based client. The Windows client was always two or three releases ahead of the Linux client. We always wanted VMware to change and improve the feature sets between the client connector on Linux and on Windows."
"VMware Workstation’s scalability could be improved."
"They could bring in many different features from VMware vSphere to Workstation."
"The support can be improved."
"They could add more integration between them, and compatibility with the standard virtualization format."
"I would like to see more detailed reporting capabilities, particularly around snapshot activity. It would be helpful to have a summary of changes made prior to deploying an application, allowing us to provide comprehensive reports to our management on a regular basis."
"It could have more platforms and CPUs."
VMware Player is ranked 8th in Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) with 10 reviews while VMware Workstation is ranked 2nd in Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) with 42 reviews. VMware Player is rated 8.6, while VMware Workstation is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of VMware Player writes "A highly stable solution that has the ability to snapshot with or without memory". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Workstation writes "An easy-to-manage solution that has really good customer support compared to other market players". VMware Player is most compared with VMware Fusion, VMware Horizon, Citrix Workspace and Parallels Desktop, whereas VMware Workstation is most compared with Hyper-V, VMware vSphere, KVM, VMware Fusion and Microsoft Remote Desktop Services. See our VMware Player vs. VMware Workstation report.
See our list of best Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.