We performed a comparison between webMethods Integration Server and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Best feature is Insight for monitoring, and as a debugging tool. It has saved us a lot of time during crisis situations."
"A product with good API and EDI components."
"The tool supports gRPC."
"The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."
"Broker and UM are the best features."
"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."
"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine)."
"Ease of implementation and flexibility to hold the business logic are the most valuable features."
"The solution is scalable."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."
"The certifications and learning resources are not exposed openly enough. For instance, they have a trial version which comes with only a few basic features, and I think that community-wise they need to offer more free or open spaces where developers can feel encouraged to experiment."
"The product must add more compatible connectors."
"The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG."
"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."
"Need to see more API portal features like monetizing APIs and private cloud readiness."
"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."
"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"It is difficult to maintain."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 23rd in Cloud Data Integration with 7 reviews. webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks, Boomi iPaaS and Oracle Service Bus, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Amazon API Gateway. See our webMethods Integration Server vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.