We performed a comparison between ABBYY Vantage and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Identifies and extract relevant elements from a document."
"We are able to extract details from a PDF and put them into a CSV. It is able to extract the details that we are looking for. We have the Machine Learning feature to extract the data with respect to the position of the field."
"ABBYY Vantage has been designed as a user-friendly solution, making the setup process require only a couple of days."
"The OTR (Optical Text Recognition) is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"We can quickly integrate the catalogs with proper documentation."
"The UI is user-friendly and ABBYY Vantage supports over 100 languages."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to scale for big processes. We are able to process 1 million pages a day. Its accuracy is also very nice. It is a good feature that they have. It is an independent platform, which is its biggest advantage as compared to other solutions. It is also very stable and powerful. It is 100% on time."
"The solution has its own language that can be configured many ways and with higher accuracy than other products."
"The most valuable features are workflow and process automation."
"The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated."
"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."
"The pricing of the solution is quite good."
"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."
"The product saves time and resources."
"The most valuable feature of Kofax RPA is the simplicity of automating tasks."
"The most valuable feature is the robotic process."
"We would like the workflow building within this solution to be more transparent, which would allow us to model the process."
"The product must provide more supporting documentation on the API capabilities of Advanced Designer."
"Not a ten because sometimes some documents have handwritten data. If this improved, I would rate it a ten out of ten."
"ABBYY Vantage could improve the processing of handwritten notes."
"It could be more intuitive. It's huge and has many options, and that makes it difficult. You have to go to Google and search for documents and videos to try and understand how it works. Some tools or processes or some parts of the process should be intuitive to make it easier for the developers."
"Occasionally, we found the Machine Learning feature to be not working as per our expectations. Sometimes, it also failed to extract details from a PDF. It would be great if training batches work with 100% accuracy. I don't see any other major concerns with ABBYY FlexiCapture."
"They should improve the RESTful API side of this solution. Currently, fully RESTful API is not available in the on-prem version, which is really a problem, and we have to work around this limitation. The cloud version already has a fully RESTful API, but the on-prem version doesn't have a fully RESTful API, which is a big mistake. It is easy to solve, but they aren't solving it quicker. They are taking a long time. Nowadays, most people don't go to the interface. They like to use RESTful API."
"The solution needs more web or cloud-based development."
"The technical support must be improved."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
"Exception handling needs to be improved."
"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."
"Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"The solution needs to be scalable."
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 6th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 46 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "Genius-level AI with very easy setup and implementation processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath Document Understanding, UiPath, HyperScience, Microsoft Power Automate and Hyland Brainware, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and HyperScience. See our ABBYY Vantage vs. Tungsten RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
