We compared AlienVault OSSIM and Wazuh based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
According to user reviews, AlienVault OSSIM is praised for its comprehensive threat detection, real-time monitoring, and strong asset management capabilities, while Wazuh is highlighted for its advanced threat detection, seamless integration with other tools, and easy installation process. AlienVault OSSIM users appreciate the customer service and pricing structure, while Wazuh users value the customer support and flexible licensing options. However, AlienVault OSSIM users desire improvements in the user interface and documentation, while Wazuh users suggest enhancements in system resource consumption. Overall, both products offer positive ROI and efficient security monitoring capabilities.
Features: AlienVault OSSIM stands out for its comprehensive threat detection and strong asset management capabilities. On the other hand, Wazuh is known for its advanced threat detection, efficient log analysis, and flexibility in tailoring the solution to specific needs.
Pricing and ROI: AlienVault OSSIM has been positively evaluated for its pricing, setup cost, and licensing. Users find the pricing structure reasonable and affordable. The setup process is straightforward and requires minimal effort. AlienVault OSSIM offers flexible licensing options. In comparison, Wazuh is also considered cost-effective with reasonable pricing options. The setup cost is hassle-free and the licensing is customizable., AlienVault OSSIM has been praised for its valuable and efficient security monitoring capabilities, cost-effectiveness, and ability to address security threats effectively. On the other hand, Wazuh users have reported various benefits and advantages from using the product.
Room for Improvement: Users have identified room for improvement in both AlienVault OSSIM and Wazuh. AlienVault OSSIM needs enhancements in user interface, documentation, support, customization, and integration capabilities. Wazuh could benefit from improvements in interface, documentation, configuration options, and system resource consumption.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews for AlienVault OSSIM highlight varying timeframes for the different phases of establishing a new tech solution. Some users took three months for deployment and an additional week for setup, while others only needed a week for both. In contrast, the reviews for Wazuh emphasize the importance of considering both deployment and setup timeframes. Some users spent three months on deployment and a week on setup, while others required a week for both., Customers have expressed positive feedback about the customer service provided by both AlienVault OSSIM and Wazuh. Users appreciate the helpful and responsive team of AlienVault OSSIM, while Wazuh's customer service is commended for their knowledge, efficiency, and helpfulness.
The summary above is based on 41 interviews we conducted recently with AlienVault OSSIM and Wazuh users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"Sentinel pricing is good"
"The most valuable feature is the alert notifications, which are categorized by severity levels: informational, low, medium, and high."
"The solution offers a lot of data on events. It helps us create specific detection strategies."
"It has a lot of great features."
"Sentinel improved how we investigate incidents. We can create watchlists and update them to align with the latest threat intelligence. The information Microsoft provides enables us to understand thoroughly and improve as we go along. It allows us to provide monthly reports to our clients on their security posture."
"We didn't have anything similar. So, it really provides value from the incidents and automation point of view. The overview of the security fabric is most valuable."
"The ability of all these solutions to work together natively is essential. We have an Azure subscription, including Log Analytics. This feature automatically acts as one of the security baselines and detects recommendations because it also integrates with Defender. We can pull the sysadmin logs from Azure. It's all seamless and native."
"Sentinel is a Microsoft product, so they provide very robust use cases and analytic groups, which are very beneficial for the security team. I also like the ability to integrate data sources into the software for on-premise and cloud-based solutions."
"AlienVault OSSIM is an enterprise solution that sells easily. It is rated highly by organizations."
"The paid version of the solution has reporting and better scalability options."
"The most valuable features of AlienVault OSSIM are case management, ease of configuration, and investigation."
"The product is easy to use."
"OSSIM is the only solution that includes the large number of modules that we need: a vulnerability scanner, a network IDS system, a host IDS system."
"The most valuable feature is the logging capability."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"You pay monthly for the solution. I think it's one of the best products. If you compare with other companies, like LogRhythm, etc., the top 8 or 10 CMs, I think Alien Vault has the best price-performance ratio."
"The deployment is easy and they provide very good documentation."
"Wazuh is free and easy to use. It is also adjustable, and we can use it on the cloud and on-premises."
"Wazuh's most beneficial features for our security needs are flexibility, built-in rules, integration capabilities, and documentation."
"If they support a solution, it is easy to do an integration."
"Good for monitoring, active response, and for vulnerabilities."
"Wazuh's logging features integrate seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services. There are also Wazuh agent configurations for different use cases, like vulnerability scanning, host-based intrusion detection, and file integrity monitoring."
"Wazuh automatically scans the host for CIS benchmarks for the latest updates and vulnerabilities and gives a host score. It provides a percentage of perceived risk due to of non patches or any missing patches on that work."
"The main thing I like about it is that it has an EDR."
"At the network level, there is a limitation in integrating some of the switches or routers with Microsoft Sentinel. Currently, SPAN traffic monitoring is not available in Microsoft Sentinel. I have heard that it is available in Defender for Identity, which is a different product. It would be good if LAN traffic monitoring or SPAN traffic monitoring is available in Microsoft Sentinel. It would add a lot of value. It is available in some of the competitor products in the market."
"Sentinel still has some anomalies. For example, sometimes when we write a query for log analysis with KQL, it doesn't give us the data in a proper way... Also, the fields or columns could be improved. Sometimes, it is not giving the desired results and there is a blank field."
"They should just add more and more out-of-the-box connectors. It is quite a new product, and it has a lot of connectors, and even more would be good."
"The AI capabilities must be improved."
"They only classify alerts into three categories: high, medium, and low. So, from the user's point of view, having another critical category would be awesome."
"They can work on the EDR side of things... Every time we need to onboard these kinds of machines into the EDR, we need to do it with the help of Intune, to sync up the devices, and do the configuration. I'm looking for something on the EDR side that will reduce this kind of work."
"The built-in SOAR is not really good out-of-the-box. The SOAR relies on logic apps and you almost need to have some kind of developer background to be able to make these logic apps. Most security people cannot develop anything..."
"The KQL query does not function effectively with Windows 11 machines, and in the majority of machine-based investigations, KQL queries are essential for organizing the data during investigations."
"Sometimes technical issues take very long to get resolved."
"I would like the solution to be able to integrate with my firewall, my IDS and my Honeypot solutions so that it can provide real-time reporting as things occur and then have alert sent to me on my phone when suspicious activity is happening."
"AlienVault OSSIM is costly."
"GUI could be improved."
"The incidence reporting could be better."
"The solution needs more integration with cyber intelligence systems."
"I don't like to work on OSSIM because it is unpredictable."
"It's under heavy traffic. If you have heavy traffic, the system is slow."
"Scalability is a challenge because it is distributed architecture and it uses Elastic DB. Their Elastic DB doesn't allow open source waste application."
"Integration with Vyara could be better."
"Wazuh is missing many things that a typical SIEM should have."
"Wazuh doesn't cover sources of events as well as Splunk. You can integrate Splunk with many sources of events, but it's a painful process to take care of some sources of events with Wazuh."
"Alerts should be specific rather than repeatedly triggered by integrating multiple factors. This issue needs improvement to create a more efficient alert system."
"The tool does not provide CTI to monitor darknet."
"Since it's an open-source tool, scalability is the main issue."
"While it is scalable, it can suffer from reduced latencies."
AlienVault OSSIM is ranked 14th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 27 reviews while Wazuh is ranked 3rd in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 38 reviews. AlienVault OSSIM is rated 7.4, while Wazuh is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of AlienVault OSSIM writes "An easy-to-scale open-source solution used for monitoring events on devices ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wazuh writes "It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services". AlienVault OSSIM is most compared with Elastic Security, USM Anywhere, Splunk Enterprise Security, Fortinet FortiSIEM and AWS Security Hub, whereas Wazuh is most compared with Elastic Security, Security Onion, Splunk Enterprise Security, Graylog and Fortinet FortiAnalyzer. See our AlienVault OSSIM vs. Wazuh report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
