We performed a comparison between Aruba Switches and D-Link Ethernet Switches based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Ethernet Switches solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the lifetime warranty."
"We like that it is very easy to manage the product through the cloud."
"The most valuable feature of Aruba Switches is its performance."
"Aruba Central is very valuable to us."
"The technical support is fantastic!"
"The most valuable features of Aruba Switches are the routing protocol and the basic functionality."
"The solution is very reliable. It's easy to use with other solutions."
"We didn't experience any stability or scalability issues until now with Aruba Switches"
"Its integration is the most valuable."
"The main selling point for me was the pricing. Moreover, the performance is good. I haven't had any issues so far."
"We use the solution for the network and ethernet connection."
"It's plug-and-play. There is no configuration necessary."
"The initial setup of D-Link Ethernet Switches is very easy."
"It is very stable and reliable."
"These switches are simple and easy to configure."
"It is a stable solution."
"The software materials could be improved."
"We've had issues with availability."
"In the next release, I would like to see network access control on the switches themselves. I would like to see security functionalities when it comes to monitoring the bit of the wireless section of the switches."
"The product could be a little more competitive price-wise."
"The port flexibility on the 54 series, specifically the 5406 for core usage, could be improved. When I want to upgrade to 10G, I don't have many options to choose from."
"Technical support response time could be better."
"There is room for improvement in the customer service and support team."
"We don't have visibility in Aruba Switches and we are thinking of switching to Fortiswitch because it has visibility."
"The D-Link Ethernet Switches have to be replaced because they are difficult to manage and security is poor. They should add centralized manageability to make the solution better, it will allow administrators to better know what is happening on the network."
"In a future release, the solution could improve by being more secure and allowing the configuration of each port."
"The technical support needs a lot of improvement."
"It could be easier to scale on managed devices."
"This solution is not good for distribution at the core."
"The solution could be cheaper."
"I'd like to see a central management system included as part of their license, not as a separate purchase. Currently, we have to manage switches independently. A central portal for managing all switches and providing visibility would be great."
"They need to enhance stability."
Aruba Switches is ranked 2nd in Ethernet Switches with 72 reviews while D-Link Ethernet Switches is ranked 13th in Ethernet Switches with 24 reviews. Aruba Switches is rated 8.4, while D-Link Ethernet Switches is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Aruba Switches writes "As a managed service provider, it's important to have a solution that can manage everything from one console". On the other hand, the top reviewer of D-Link Ethernet Switches writes "Plug-and-play, zero maintenance, and reasonably priced". Aruba Switches is most compared with Cisco Ethernet Switches, Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access, Meraki MS Switches, Ubiquiti UniFi Switches and Arista Networks Platform, whereas D-Link Ethernet Switches is most compared with NETGEAR Switches, Cisco Ethernet Switches, MikroTik Routers and Switches, Ubiquiti UniFi Switches and Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches. See our Aruba Switches vs. D-Link Ethernet Switches report.
See our list of best Ethernet Switches vendors.
We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
