We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."The key role for Glue is that it hosts our metadata before rolling out our actual data. This is the major advantage of using this solution and our clients client have been very satisfied with it."
"AWS Glue is quite better than other tools, but you have to learn it properly before you start using it."
"The solution is serverless so it allows us to transform data while optimizing the cost and performance of Spark jobs."
"What I like best about AWS Glue is its real-time data backup feature. Last week, there was a production push, and what used to take almost ten days to send out around fifty-six thousand emails now takes only two hours."
"Our entire use case was very easily handled or solved using this solution."
"The solution is highly user-friendly, and its features are easy to use. The new addition of AWS Glue Data Catalog is also very beneficial, making the tool even more helpful for its users."
"AWS Glue is a stable and easy-to-use solution."
"It is a stable and scalable solution."
"People are able to scale up, learn it quickly, and start delivering."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is its ease of use. We do not depend on any tool to develop it. Everything is on the browser and is easy to integrate, even for someone who does not understand a lot about coding."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Provides various ways to secure services as well as providing extensive support."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service is a really good product and the ROI is very good with it. It lowers development time. A development cycle that may have taken a year without Oracle Integration Cloud Service can drop down to three or four months with it."
"In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files."
"The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The technical support for this solution could be improved. In future, we would like to connect more services like Athena or Kinesis to help control more loads of data."
"There is a learning curve to this tool."
"One area that could be improved is the ETL view. The drag-and-drop interface is not as user-friendly as some other ETL tools."
"If there's a cluster-related configuration, we have to make worker notes, which is quite a headache when processing a large amount of data."
"Currently, it supports only two languages in the background: Python and Scala. From our customization point of view, it would be helpful if it can also support Java in the background."
"I have encountered challenges with multi-region support."
"Cost-wise, AWS Glue is expensive, so that's an area for improvement. The process for setting up the solution was also complex, which is another area for improvement."
"AWS Glue is more costly compared to other tools like Airflow."
"The logging capabilities could be enhanced. Currently, logs are only retained for a few days, which can be inconvenient for administrators. Ideally, we'd like the option to configure log retention periods, like a month or fifteen days, instead of the current one-week limit."
"There are a few features that we noticed are not in the cloud. There are some improvements needed. One example is the graphical user interface that needs to improve, it could be easier to use."
"Make it more similar to the on-premises features. For example, if you can edit the code directly rather than just dragging and dropping, or if you can edit the examples by going into the background, and one-click migration, I'd like to see included in the next release."
"In designer mode, sometimes the browser closure or other unknown issues can cause strange behavior, which requires a restart."
"The support and resources were lacking — they weren't there."
"Sometimes, the tech support is slow to get back to us. We have had to wait up to two weeks for a response."
"It has lengthy documentation, making the process of building applications more time-consuming."
"The solution's customer service could be better."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Confluent, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle GoldenGate, Azure Data Factory and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.