Azure Monitor vs Prometheus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
19,277 views|16,430 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Prometheus Logo
6,474 views|5,765 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jun 28, 2023

We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and Prometheus based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Azure Monitor has a complex initial setup that can take several days depending on the environment's complexity, while Prometheus is easier to set up with basic configuration and deployment. However, customizing Prometheus for specific needs may take more time.
  • Features: Azure Monitor provides log analysis, graphs, charts, and reporting. Prometheus, on the other hand, is known for its flexibility and integration capabilities through APIs and libraries that can be easily integrated with various languages and operators. It also offers a dashboard for collecting and comparing logs from different resources and has the ability to extract data from multiple sources and store it in a single place.
  • Pricing: Azure Monitor has a varying pricing system based on log and service integration, whereas Prometheus is a free and open source solution. Azure Monitor operates on a monthly fee licensing system depending on log file size, while Prometheus' pricing is determined by how it is set up on a personal server. Azure Monitor is considered affordable and pay-as-you-go, but Prometheus is essentially free in comparison to other options.
  • Service and Support:  Azure Monitor offers varying levels of technical support while Prometheus relies on community support and documentation. Users generally rate Azure Monitor's support positively, while Prometheus users have not needed to reach out for support due to available resources.
  • ROI: Azure Monitor's ROI is inconsistent among users, although it remains a cost-effective option. On the other hand, Prometheus is a dependable and free solution that delivers a positive ROI.

Comparison Results: Azure Monitor is the preferred option over Prometheus due to its comprehensive features and seamless integration with other Microsoft technologies. It offers log analysis, graphs, charts, and reporting, making it a convenient one-stop-shop for monitoring all resources. Although Prometheus is highly flexible and compatible, it lacks user-friendly visualization tools and a reliable customer service system.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Monitor vs. Prometheus Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Azure Monitor's best features are its graphs and charts, the different visibility options, and reporting.""The solution very easily integrates with Azure services and in one click you can monitor your resource.""Recently, they have improved their integration with other resources, so we get even more robust data.""I use the solution to monitor the infrastructure and applications.""Data exporting is easy, and this tool works seamlessly with other solutions. It's a stable and low-priced solution.""The most valuable feature is that it ensures our servers are up.""The initial setup is straightforward.""The most valuable feature is that it's stable. It hasn't crossed any thresholds."

More Azure Monitor Pros →

"The solution offers an easy way to install and scratch values.""The product has an easy-to-understand interface.""It is an efficient solution.""The most valuable features of Prometheus are the many functions available. The functions are helpful for understanding the behavior of applications and infrastructure.""The product’s scalability is valuable.""Prometheus is a great solution for monitoring.""I like its lightweight configuration functions.""The most valuable feature of Prometheus is the ease of pulling the metrics."

More Prometheus Pros →

Cons
"The scalability could be improved as there are some limitations.""The biggest one is probably just the user interface. There could be more advanced logging at the database level. They can also improve their query builder to allow you to search for things better, but I last used it about a year ago. They might have already changed a ton of things in the newer versions.""Azure Monitor could improve the visualization aspect and integrate better with other third-party services.""Azure Monitor's integration with applications could be improved.""The length of latency is terrible and needs to be improved.""They need to work on a more hybrid deployment that will allow us to monitor local on-premise deployments and connect to different systems. I would like to see more integration.""The troubleshooting logs need improvement. There should be some improvement there. I have a hard time finding the right logs at the right times whenever there is an issue occurring.""have used multiple products like Webex and PRTG. Some features could be added. Azure Monitor should add SMS and APIs. We have very limited access to Azure Monitor. I usually get alerts on my phone when they are integrated with Slack. I am not always available, but my team is. Sometimes, I am traveling and don't have access to my email, but I have Slack and other third-party projects that send me instant messages if a sensor goes down."

More Azure Monitor Cons →

"The query language in Prometheus is an area of concern where improvements are required.""The scalability must be improved.""Its stability could be even better.""Prometheus can be initially difficult for users since it has its query language, PromQL. The minimalistic interface is complicated to understand. They need to improve their interface so that users who don't know PromQL can also use it. You can only leverage the tool when you know PromQL.""The simplicity of the query language could be improved. The current query language is not easy to work with.""There isn’t much clarity regarding the issues that happen at the server end. It is a push model and from the client’s point of view, it needs to look better and solve remote issues.""Its documentation could be clearer to understand.""If you want to collect details of metrics, you should be able to write a query for it directly. I want the product to offer better queries for the metrics."

More Prometheus Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Azure Monitor is a low-priced solution, which is why it would work best on small-scale projects."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "Azure Monitor is a competitively priced solution."
  • "Azure Monitor is one of the more cost effective solutions on the market."
  • "The cost of Azure Monitor application performance should be less expensive."
  • "The licensing is a monthly fee."
  • "I would rate Azure Monitor a two out of five for affordability."
  • "The solution is very costly because you have to pay for various things such as adding to logs and internet alerts."
  • More Azure Monitor Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of Prometheus is good, it is affordable because it is open source and there is no cost to it. You put it on your own server and the costs incurred completely depend on how you set it up."
  • "This is an open-source solution."
  • "The solution is not expensive."
  • "The solution is open source."
  • "The solution is free of cost."
  • "We use the solution's open-source version."
  • "The tool is open-sourced."
  • "We have the open-source version, so we don't pay for it."
  • More Prometheus Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we… more »
    Top Answer:Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.
    Top Answer:We cannot use AI services with the solution.
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Prometheus is its ability to collect metrics.
    Top Answer:For a project I am currently working on in my company, I use Grafana, but for the data source part, I use Prometheus. I use Prometheus in a Kubernetes cluster. I use Prometheus for the processes… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    19,277
    Comparisons
    16,430
    Reviews
    28
    Average Words per Review
    508
    Rating
    7.7
    Views
    6,474
    Comparisons
    5,765
    Reviews
    32
    Average Words per Review
    387
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Datadog logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Dynatrace logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Sentry logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Grafana logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    New Relic logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    New Relic logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    Dynatrace logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Sentry logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    AWS X-Ray logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    ITRS Geneos logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure. 

    With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts. 

    Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.  

    Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility. 

    Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

    Prometheus is a powerful open-source monitoring and alerting toolkit designed for cloud-native environments. 

    It collects metrics from various sources, including applications, services, and infrastructure components, providing real-time insights into system performance. 

    With its flexible data model and query language, Prometheus enables users to analyze and visualize metrics, facilitating troubleshooting and capacity planning. Its robust alerting system allows for proactive monitoring, notifying users of any anomalies or issues. 

    Prometheus also offers seamless integration with popular tools and frameworks, making it a versatile solution for monitoring and observability.

    Sample Customers
    Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company32%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Retailer13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Educational Organization7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise31%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Azure Monitor vs. Prometheus
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. Prometheus and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 44 reviews while Prometheus is ranked 9th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 32 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while Prometheus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Prometheus writes "A very flexible open box that can be used vastly to do anything you need". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Sentry, Grafana and New Relic, whereas Prometheus is most compared with New Relic, Dynatrace, Sentry, AWS X-Ray and ITRS Geneos. See our Azure Monitor vs. Prometheus report.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.