We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and CloudPassage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"PingSafe offers comprehensive security posture management."
"We really appreciate the Slack integration. When we have an incident, we get an instant notification. We also use Joe Sandbox, which Singularity can integrate with, so we can verify if a threat is legitimate."
"The most valuable features of PingSafe are cloud misconfiguration, Kubernetes, and IaC scanning."
"The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best features."
"With PingSafe, it's easy to onboard new accounts."
"Cloud Native Security has helped us with our risk posture and securing our agenda. It has been tremendous in terms of supporting growth."
"PingSafe offers security solutions for both Kubernetes and CI/CD pipelines."
"SentinelOne stands out with its responsiveness to feature requests for Singularity Cloud Security."
"We like the ability to investigate, analyze, and generate reports."
"The new scanning function is a valuable feature that wasn't available until recently."
"Almost all the features are valuable, but the most important is proactive threat detection. The overall administration, seamless integration, and being able to have one platform for monitoring our applications for suspicious activities and any potential security threats are also valuable."
"Gives us centralized firewall management for both Windows and Linux distros. Also provides a clear view of the security configurations and connections across environments (DMZ, external and internal networks)."
"Auto remediation is a very effective feature that helps ensure less manual intervention."
"We really liked its ease of implementation against our Microsoft Azure environment."
"It is easy to administer and easy to deploy. It has automated or pre-configured templates, security features, and proactive threat detection."
"The two most valuable features for us are the central firewall administrator and the real-time cloud compliance monitoring."
"Policies are very easy to manage on a day-to-day basis."
"Key features are the Software Vulnerability Assessment and the CSM, which is the configuration check."
"SentinelOne currently lacks a break glass account feature, which is critical for implementing Single Sign-On."
"We've found a lot of false positives."
"here is a bit of a learning curve. However, you only need two to three days to identify options and get accustomed."
"We recently adopted a new ticket management solution, so we've asked them to include a connector to integrate that tool with Cloud Native Security directly. We'd also like to see Cloud Native Security add a scan for personally identifying information. We're looking at other tools for this capability, but having that functionality built into Cloud Native Security would be nice. Monitoring PII data is critical to us as an organization."
"Some of the navigation and some aspects of the portal may be a little bit confusing."
"We don't get any notifications from PingSafe when the clusters are down."
"PingSafe's current documentation could be improved to better assist customers during the cluster onboarding process."
"PingSafe can be improved by developing a comprehensive set of features that allow for automated workflows."
"Automation and advanced threat prevention have room for improvement."
"The product must provide different features like antivirus."
"The license cost is expensive and has room for improvement."
"The integration process could be enhanced by enabling integration at the organizational level rather than requiring the manual setup of individual accounts."
"The price of this solution should be reduced so that it is more affordable to scale."
"The impact analysis that they perform can be improved. It is currently lacking. It should be more detailed."
"The false positives can be annoying at times."
"The rules are not well-tuned, and many of them generate false positives or nonsensical results."
"Of all the advertised functions, I only find two things that really work in my environment, even though I wanted to use all of them. They're not flexible enough to be used."
"Anything outside of the software vulnerability management and the CSM, things like the GhostPort, need some improvement. The dashboard is in beta. It looks really good, I wish it would come out of beta."
"The reports and graphs are unintuitive."
"In the CSM module the policies are really hard to work with it. It is not very flexible at all. I would suggest that they change that. Right now, the scan is based on the group that the server is in. What happens if the server is in multiple groups?"
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 64 reviews while CloudPassage is ranked 41st in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP). Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while CloudPassage is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CloudPassage writes "CloudPassage has a bunch of features. Be sure you understand all of them and how to extract value to your organization". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, AWS GuardDuty, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas CloudPassage is most compared with . See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. CloudPassage report.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors and best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
