We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and NowSecure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)."Scan reviews can occur during the development lifecycle."
"Apart from software scanning, software composition scanning is valuable."
"From my point of view, it is the best product on the market."
"Vulnerability details is valuable."
"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."
"The user interface is modern and nice to use."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the SCA module and the code-checking module. Additionally, the solutions are explanatory and helpful."
"The most valuable feature is that it actually identifies the different criteria you can set to meet whatever standards you're trying to get your system accredited for."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to download an application without actually putting in the APK. It gives us an option to put the APK in if we want to but we can download it from the App Store and Play Store."
"Checkmarx could improve by reducing the price."
"You can't use it in the continuous delivery pipeline because the scanning takes too much time."
"We want to have a holistic view of the portfolio-level dashboard and not just an individual technical project level."
"The solution's user interface could be improved because it seems outdated."
"The tool is currently quite static in terms of finding security vulnerabilities. It would be great if it was more dynamic and we had even more tools at our disposal to keep us safe. It would help if there was more scanning or if the process was more automated."
"We can run only one project at a time."
"I would like to see the rate of false positives reduced."
"Checkmarx being Windows only is a hindrance. Another problem is: why can't I choose PostgreSQL?"
"In this solution, there are two kinds of testing, static analysis, and dynamic analysis. There needs some improvement in testing with dynamic analysis because I have found it is not accurate"
Earn 20 points
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 67 reviews while NowSecure is ranked 33rd in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while NowSecure is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NowSecure writes "Scalable and reliable, but dynamic analysis needs improvement". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas NowSecure is most compared with Veracode, GitLab, Data Theorem API Secure and Acunetix.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.