• Home
  • Cisco CloudCenter vs. Cloud Technology Partners ADF

Cisco CloudCenter vs Cloud Technology Partners ADF comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
IBM Turbonomic
Read 204 IBM Turbonomic reviews
945 views|432 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Cisco Logo
Cisco CloudCenter
Read 9 Cisco CloudCenter reviews
167 views|99 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Cloud Technology Partners Logo
Cloud Technology Partners ADF
33 views|27 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Migration
June 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco CloudCenter and Cloud Technology Partners ADF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Zerto, Nasuni and others in Cloud Migration.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Migration Report (Updated: June 2024).
Download the complete report
787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
It shows you what you should do, but it can also act on recommendations automatically
Our organization uses cloud-based infrastructure, so everything is metered. You're wasting money if you have a system running but you're not using... Read more →
Anonymous User
Easy-to-deploy and supports Amazon Azure, GCP and vSphere, but improvements are needed in UI
We are system integrators and deploy this solution for our customers.
Use Cloud Technology Partners ADF?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We felt the pricing was very fair for the product. It is in no way prohibitive for larger deployments, unlike other similar product on the market."
  • "Contact the Turbonomic sales team, explain your needs and what you're looking to monitor. They will get a pre-sales SE on the phone and together work up a very accurate quote."
  • "What I can advise is to trial the product, taking advantage of the Turbonomic pre-sales implemention support and kickstart training."
  • "Licensing is per socket, so load up on the cores rather than a lot of lower core CPUs."
  • "You should understand the cost of your physical servers and how much time and money you are spending year over year on expanding your virtual farm."
  • "Price is a big one. VMTurbo was very competitively priced."
  • "If you're a super-small business, it may be a little bit pricey for you... But in large, enterprise companies where money is, maybe, less of an issue, Turbonomic is not that expensive. I can't imagine why any big company would not buy it, for what it does."
  • "It was an annual buy-in. You basically purchase it based on your host type stuff. The buy-in was about 20K, and the annual maintenance is about $3,000 a year."

    • More IBM Turbonomic Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is extremely expensive and has additional fees for things like monitoring."
  • "The tool's pricing is balanced with the market."
  • "The tool's pricing is expensive."

    • More Cisco CloudCenter Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?
    Top Answer:I have not seen Turbonomic's new pricing since IBM purchased it. When we were looking at it in my previous company… more »
    Read all 17 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Turbonomic?
    Top Answer:I would like Turbonomic to add more services, especially in the cloud area. I have already told them this. They can add… more »
    Read all 24 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?
    Top Answer:I mostly provide it to my clients. There are multiple reasons why they would use it depending on the client's needs and… more »
    Read all 26 answers   →
    What do you like most about Cisco CloudCenter?
    Top Answer:The initial setup process is straightforward.
    Read all 9 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Cisco CloudCenter?
    Top Answer:They should provide an entire cloud offering, from architecture to network security features.
    Read all 9 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Cisco CloudCenter?
    Top Answer:We use the product for demonstration, device provisioning, and data management.
    Read all 7 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager
    CliQr, CliQr CloudCenter
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Cisco
    Cloud Technology Partners
    Video Not Available
    Interactive Demo
    IBM
    Watch a demo
    Cisco
    Demo Not Available
    Cloud Technology Partners
    Demo Not Available
    Overview

    IBM Turbonomic is a performance and cost optimization platform for public, private, and hybrid clouds used by customers to assure application performance while eliminating inefficiencies by dynamically resourcing applications through automated actions. Common use cases include cloud cost optimization, cloud migration planning, data center modernization, FinOps acceleration, Kubernetes optimization, sustainable IT, and application resource management. Turbonomic customers report an average 33% reduction in cloud and infrastructure waste without impacting application performance, and return-on-investment of 471% over three years. Ready to take a closer look? Explore the interactive demo or start your free 30-day trial today!

    The Cisco CloudCenter solution is an application-centric hybrid cloud management platform that securely provisions infrastructure resources and deploys applications to data center, private cloud, and public cloud environments.

    With Cisco CloudCenter breakthrough application-centric technology, users
    can:

    • Model: Quickly and easily build a cloud-independent application profile that defines the deployment and management requirements of an entire application stack.
    • Deploy: Use one click to deploy the application profile and related components and data to any data center or cloud environment.
    • Manage: Apply a wide range of application lifecycle actions to set policies to enable in-place scaling, support cross-environment bursting or high availability and disaster recovery, and stop the deployment.

    Cloud Technology Partners ADF (Application Decision Framework) is a cloud-hosted solution for collecting and managing application portfolio data and decision making, and is the ideal companion to Application Migration initiatives in the enterprise.

    Sample Customers
    IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.
    NTT, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), CollabNet, Pratt & Miller, PZFlex
    Pegasystems, CallMiner, AFL Global
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company35%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Healthcare Company9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise71%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Migration
    June 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Zerto, Nasuni and others in Cloud Migration. Updated: June 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco CloudCenter is ranked 10th in Cloud Migration with 9 reviews while Cloud Technology Partners ADF is ranked 29th in Cloud Migration. Cisco CloudCenter is rated 7.8, while Cloud Technology Partners ADF is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco CloudCenter writes "Useful features for configuring down to ports but extremely expensive". On the other hand, Cisco CloudCenter is most compared with Cisco Intersight, CloudStack, VMware Aria Automation and Cisco UCS Director, whereas Cloud Technology Partners ADF is most compared with .

    See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.