We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Cisco Wireless WAN's most valuable feature is it is robust."
"The initial setup was really easy and straightforward."
"It just gives you the ability to use it around the office without being tied up to an actual physical connection."
"The solution offers very good performance, especially for iPhones."
"I also like that now you can add a cellular connection to the Cisco router. So, if your operator is down, you can now still have one connection in the office with the cellular module."
"It runs well, without issue."
"Our most valuable feature involves the 802.11ac, which operates at a very high level and has updated technology."
"This stability is one of the major reasons to stick with this product."
"The solution has an easy configuration."
"It functions properly and includes centralized management for access points and switches."
"I have found the most valuable features to be the ability to use the main centralized administration process and the internet."
"They are reliable in terms of wireless connectivity."
"This is a high-quality solution that allows us to provide wifi access points in challenging areas."
"We have found the product to be scalable."
"We use the solution for many of our smaller customers and the cloud management aspect of the solution is very good. If you compare it to other vendors that have a controller, it's much easier to manage the cloud-based solution because we travel a lot. It allows us to manage everything from any place."
"The ease of the setup is one of its most valuable aspects."
"Cisco Wireless WAN would be improved with the ability to monitor new usernames, product registrations, and flow traffic."
"The setup of Cisco Wireless WAN needs an expert. You need someone with experience to be able to work with Cisco Wireless solutions. It took approximately one to two weeks to implement the solution."
"We would like to have the lead times improved."
"The solution could lower its pricing to make it more affordable."
"The price could be better."
"The only thing I would like to see is better high availability if you're using the embedded wireless controller."
"Pricing is very high with Cisco products. It's something that many people complain about. They should work to make it more affordable."
"The tool's speed and IP address acquisition from the domain controller should be improved"
"This product has issues with scalability and ease of manageability at scale. Security also needs to be improved, when compared to its competitors. Ubiquiti Wireless doesn't have any support that you can call. They only have an online portal where you can access support documentation, but it's not great. You have to figure out issues and solutions for yourself."
"The technical support is less than stellar."
"Difficult to see error logs and locate the problem."
"We'd like them to improve aspects of device management."
"The product lacks some security features."
"There isn't any technical support."
"The accessibility to technical support could be better."
"After upgrades to the interface, some features disappear."
Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 61 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "Widely available and has a straightforward setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Fortinet FortiExtender, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Aruba Wireless. See our Cisco Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.