We compared CrowdStrike Falcon and Fortinet FortiEDR based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
CrowdStrike Falcon is praised for its strong threat detection capabilities, advanced technology, and effective incident response, with user-friendly interface and proactive threat hunting. Fortinet FortiEDR offers advanced threat detection, efficient security, and seamless integration, with emphasis on improving user interface and usability. CrowdStrike Falcon focuses on real-time monitoring, while Fortinet FortiEDR highlights flexible deployment options and scalability.
Features: CrowdStrike Falcon stands out for its robust threat detection, advanced machine learning, and proactive threat hunting capabilities. Fortinet FortiEDR excels in advanced threat detection, efficient endpoint security, and flexible deployment options with scalability.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for CrowdStrike Falcon is described as straightforward and hassle-free, requiring minimal effort. Users appreciate the flexible and customizable licensing options. Meanwhile, Fortinet FortiEDR also offers a straightforward setup process with minimal effort required. Customers are satisfied with the flexibility and options provided for licensing., CrowdStrike Falcon delivers significant ROI with improved cybersecurity and threat detection capabilities, while Fortinet FortiEDR also provides positive ROI according to user feedback.
Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike Falcon could improve its user interface, reporting capabilities, integration options, detection accuracy, customer support, and system performance. Fortinet FortiEDR could benefit from enhancements in its user interface, setup process, documentation, training resources, reporting capabilities, and dashboards.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews for CrowdStrike Falcon indicate that the duration to establish the tech solution varies among users, with some taking three months for deployment and others only needing a week for setup. In contrast, Fortinet FortiEDR has users reporting either three months for deployment and an additional week for setup or just one week for both., Users highly praised the customer service of CrowdStrike Falcon, finding the team responsive, knowledgeable, and reliable. On the other hand, customers expressed satisfaction with Fortinet FortiEDR's customer service, noting excellent assistance and guidance.
The summary above is based on 70 interviews we conducted recently with CrowdStrike Falcon and Fortinet FortiEDR users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"I like Falcon's threat detection and endpoint investigation features. It's a user-friendly solution."
"CrowdStrike enables the infrastructure managers to visualize all the events and get information about the network."
"It seems to do a pretty good job of protecting the host. It offers good insights that it gives you when it has a detection. It's pretty incredible."
"CrowdStrike Falcon has done an excellent job at detecting breaches. It has allowed us to stay in business and keep our systems up."
"I value the overall behavior analysis of CrowdStrike. The engine of this product is what drew us to this solution."
"The most valuable features of CrowdStrike Falcon include Falcon Fusion workflows and endpoint detection capabilities."
"CrowdStrike Falcon is a very light solution. It does not use too much processor or RAM."
"I like the vulnerability assessment and proactive hunting features of CrowdStrike Falcon."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The performance could be better."
"The solution could improve by providing more types of reports because it's in the detection span you cannot re-export anything. If it could be exported to a CSV file directly there it would help a lot. I currently need to do this by API to get what I need."
"I would like to see equal support across all versions. Aside from that, I would say most of the features are there."
"They should provide us with good visibility for everything."
"Sometimes CrowdStrike changes the GUI, and they need to be better at informing us and providing guidance concerning that."
"The biggest issue with Falcon as a standalone product is it doesn't have very much reporting."
"A year and a half ago or more, if you put in a support request by email, then it wasn't timely addressed. It could be a day to three days before you received a response, which was a bit frustrating. There was a lot of customer feedback around this issue, which has been greatly refined."
"I have worked with their technical support on several problems that were never fully resolved."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
CrowdStrike Falcon is ranked 3rd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 106 reviews while Fortinet FortiEDR is ranked 13th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 30 reviews. CrowdStrike Falcon is rated 8.8, while Fortinet FortiEDR is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CrowdStrike Falcon writes "Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiEDR writes "A proactive solution that works as a proactive upgrade from a firewall". CrowdStrike Falcon is most compared with Microsoft Defender XDR, Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform. See our CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Fortinet FortiEDR report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
