We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiClient and Perimeter 81 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"It is very easy and useful. A normal user with basic information can easily connect to any environment."
"It's easy to use, easy to deploy, and I have more visibility over my network that shows which users are connected to the firewalls, which users are connected to the network, and what they're accessing."
"EMS central reporting with fabric connectivity to FortiGate and FortiAnalyser is great and has seamless integration which makes managing 3000 devices a breeze."
"It's very stable."
"You can scale the product."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"The return on investment was very reasonable. It was low cost and it functioned, so the return on investment was excellent."
"From an application perspective, this solution is stable."
"The setup is really easy...I rate the support team a ten out of ten."
"SD-WAN is one of the primary solutions offered by Perimeter 81."
"Perimeter 81 is very pretty."
"The solution provides us with an easy way to configure and join the VPN with Perimeter 81."
"Even after restarting, it tries to quickly reestablish connection which is very helpful."
"The ease of use not only translates to quick adoption rates - it also ensures that our employees remain compliant with our cybersecurity protocols, enhancing the overall security posture of our organization."
"Perimeter 81 provides a very secure and non-disruptive experience."
"Logging back into Perimeter 81 is relatively user-friendly as I just need to re-type my Windows credentials in to access the VPN."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"I think that FortiClient can enhance the multifactor authentication."
"It would be extremely useful to have an automatic updating feature."
"I would like for the next release to be more user-friendly for users to do not have as much of a technical background."
"The price could also use improvement."
"The reports could be easier to set up."
"The solution should have faster turnaround when it comes to new technology."
"The deployment status is not good in Mac devices and sometimes in Windows-based devices using GPO, like Active Directory, that are not on the local network."
"The solution could be more secure. I would like to see more safety features."
"I have found that the log-in/out process takes quite some time."
"Its initial setup process is complex for a hybrid environment."
"I don't know if it is technically feasible, however, if the Desktop App could be used as a Web App or a Chrome Extension it would be very nice."
"The overall UI could be improved and updated to bring a simpler feel to the application."
"I would suggest adding more networking and security features that allow more customization within their platform."
"Currently, I am not able to define a different country or location, which can result in negative experiences as the tool is being recognized by websites and this can make it difficult to access them or force me to disable the program temporarily."
"The solution's speed of upload and download is an area where it lacks"
"The platform still lacks relevant dashboards and the ability to customize them based on our needs."
Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 85 reviews while Perimeter 81 is ranked 8th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 22 reviews. Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0, while Perimeter 81 is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Perimeter 81 writes "Great SAML and SCIM support with the ability to deploy site-2-site tunnels with specific IP restrictions". Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiEDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, whereas Perimeter 81 is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cloudflare Access and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway. See our Fortinet FortiClient vs. Perimeter 81 report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.