We compared Fortinet FortiGate and Sangfor NGAF based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Fortinet FortiGate and Sangfor NGAF both offer strong security measures and reliable performance, with Fortinet FortiGate excelling in customer service and support, while Sangfor NGAF boasts affordability and efficiency in threat detection. Fortinet FortiGate users appreciate its comprehensive reporting functionalities and cost savings, while Sangfor NGAF users value its ease of integration and network protection. Areas of improvement include the complexity of Fortinet FortiGate's user interface and Sangfor NGAF's need for better documentation and technical support.
Features: Fortinet FortiGate stands out for its strong security measures, effective firewall capabilities, intuitive interface, reliable performance, and comprehensive reporting functionalities. In comparison, Sangfor NGAF offers advanced security measures, ease of integration, robust network protection, efficient threat detection, and a user-friendly interface.
Pricing and ROI: The setup costs differ between Fortinet FortiGate and Sangfor NGAF. Users find the setup cost for Fortinet FortiGate to be minimal and straightforward, allowing for easy deployment. Sangfor NGAF also has a reasonable setup cost with a straightforward licensing process., Comparing ROI, Fortinet FortiGate is praised for effectiveness, robust features, ease of use, and cost savings. Sangfor NGAF improves security, efficiency, and reduces costs with user-friendly interface and comprehensive features.
Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiGate has room for improvement in its complex user interface, challenging setup process, performance issues, and occasional downtime. Sangfor NGAF would benefit from enhancements in user interface, documentation, technical support, advanced features, and customization options.
Deployment and customer support: Based on the user reviews, both Fortinet FortiGate and Sangfor NGAF have similar durations for deployment and setup phases. The reviews suggest that these timeframes should be considered together unless they refer to the same period., Fortinet FortiGate exhibits strong customer service and support, with prompt and effective assistance. Technical issues are efficiently resolved, highlighting the reliability of their customer service. Sangfor NGAF also offers prompt and helpful support, with knowledgeable and professional staff addressing queries and issues efficiently. Both products provide satisfactory customer service.
The summary above is based on 132 interviews we conducted recently with Fortinet FortiGate and Sangfor NGAF users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The most valuable features are the enterprise modeling and the simple interface."
"Layer-3 firewall and routing are the most valuable features."
"The main benefit is the grouping of our security monitoring."
"The solution is stable."
"The most important feature, normally for small business customers, is link load balancing."
"Offers good security and filtering."
"The ease of setting the solution up is a valuable aspect for us."
"It is useful for protecting and segregating the internal networks from the internet. Most of our customers also use the FortiGate client to connect to their offices by using the VPN client, and of course, they usually activate the antivirus, deep inspection, and intrusion prevention services. They are also using it for web filtering and implementing various policies dealing with forwardings, NAT, etc."
"The VPN connectivity feature is really nice."
"In our hospital, Sangfor NGAF works well for us in terms of ensuring confidentiality and availability, which are crucial in the healthcare industry."
"While the features are not dissimilar to other brands, configuration is much more simple, which works out great for Indonesian people."
"Sangfor NGAF's standout feature is its powerful application control, enabling precise restrictions on mobile user access to approved applications."
"The level of support provided to local companies is good. They transform their application control and other settings according to that country."
"It's a very simple to use product."
"Sangfor is a good solution that provides a WAF and firewall solution. Most other vendors, like Sophos and Fortinet and Cisco, only provide one solution. That's a valuable feature of Sangfor."
"It is a stable solution."
"Security is a continuous process. In every product, there is a requirement for improvement. Its pricing should also be improved according to Indian market requirements. They must also improve on the reporting part. Its reporting can be more precise. If we can get a real-time report in a specific format, it will be helpful for customers to know about the current status of their security."
"The room for improvement is about the global delivery time period. Usually I need to wait for almost one month to deliver it overseas. So if you can shorten the deliver time it'd be great."
"Technical support for this solution can be improved."
"Fortinet needs more memory to save the log files. We need it to save the logs on the hardware and not in the cloud. I know this feature is available in FortiCloud, but if we need this log locally, it is not available."
"Application management can be improved."
"FortiLink is the interface on the firewall that allows you to extend switch management across all of your switches in the network. The problem with it is that you can't use multiple interfaces unless you set them up in a lag. Only then you can run them. So, it forces you to use a core type of switch to propagate that management out to the rest of the switches, and then it is running the case at 200. It leaves you with 18 ports on the firewall because it is also a layer-three router that could also be used as a switch, but as soon as you do that, you can't really use them. They could do a little bit more clean up in the way the stacking interface works. Some use cases and the documentation on the FortiLink checking interface are a little outdated. I can find stuff on version 5 or more, but it is hard to find information on some of the newer firmware. The biggest thing I would like to see is some improvement in the switch management feature. I would like to be able to relegate some of the ports, which are on the firewall itself, to act as a switch to take advantage of those ports. Some of these firewalls have clarity ports on them. If I can use those, it would mean that I need to buy two less switches, which saves time. I get why they don't, but I would still like to see it because it would save a little bit of space in the server rack."
"Fortinet could improve the windows opener or the virtual IP solutions for opening windows. The virtual IP settings need improvement as firewalls are trending in new development directions."
"Scalability for Fortinet FortiGate needs to be improved. SD-WAN security for this solution also needs some improvement."
"The web interface needs to be improved, making it more user-friendly."
"Sangfor could improve by providing better real-time reporting, as the current reports don't offer the level of detail we need, especially for runtime insights."
"The solution has too many bugs and these slow down the implementation."
"The setup phase is quite complex."
"Sangfor has recently increased their prices."
"Sangfor need greater exposer in the market because the market is mainly saturated by Fortinet. The user experience of Fortinet is quite different compared to NGAF. If we want to switch our users from Fortinet to NGAF, we have to convince them that the user experience will be much easier once once they start to use it."
"It does not offer any recommendations on how to mitigate or control attacks."
"The solution should be able to work in a hybrid setup."
Fortinet FortiGate is ranked 2nd in Firewalls with 306 reviews while Sangfor NGAF is ranked 20th in Firewalls with 31 reviews. Fortinet FortiGate is rated 8.4, while Sangfor NGAF is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate writes "It's a reliable solution that's easy to install and cheaper than competitors ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sangfor NGAF writes "Affordable, easy to configure firewall with fast, responsive support". Fortinet FortiGate is most compared with Sophos XG, Cisco Secure Firewall, Netgate pfSense, Meraki MX and Fortinet FortiGate-VM, whereas Sangfor NGAF is most compared with Sophos XG, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, Netgate pfSense, Check Point NGFW and Fortinet FortiOS. See our Fortinet FortiGate vs. Sangfor NGAF report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
