We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiSIEM and Statseeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the anomaly-reporting alarms."
"It's easy to manage. There's a web interface and a command line, depending on what the user is comfortable with. There's a large knowledge base available, and the support is timely."
"It gives us the opportunity to generate notifications based upon rules that get triggered, and the rules could be specific to PCI, HIPAA, GIBA, NIST, and so forth."
"The advanced agents used to collect logs have been most valuable. We have also made use of the advanced intelligence this solution offers."
"FortiSIEM provides a single PIN to monitor SOC and NOC. It's a nice tool for integration and monitoring. It provides multiple categories for monitoring based on security designations like low, medium, and high."
"The seamless integration with FortiGate is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"There are things like dashboards and reports (pre-configured and custom) that let me know that things are operating the way they should be, and when they are not."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."
"This solution helps in terms of troubleshooting, and you can do capacity planning with it."
"If you need a product that's able to monitor all the ports in your environment or all the ports that you want, this is a great product to use. Statseeker is quite flexible in tailoring the product, spending time tailoring the product with you. It's fairly low maintenance. It's quite quick."
"The most valuable features are scalability and reliability."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the simplicity of adding new devices into it."
"It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages."
"Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is."
"The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us."
"Fortinet FortiSIEM could improve by having better integration and extensions. This would benefit by allowing us to give more rules."
"Our customers are noticing configuration available in the GUI interface and I think that they should be equal."
"The graphs on the user interface could be improved as we often experience glitches."
"Sometimes, if there are changes made by a user on a database server, it can be difficult to get that information on the fly. I would like to see a situation where once I specify a user with the database server I need, and with the changes they have performed on that, I don't need to continue my search pattern to drill down just to get the information."
"An improvement would be if FortiSIEM's licensing was based on the number of nodes rather than the EPS."
"Does not have load-sharing or high-availability, and these are important things to implement. I can do the same things in another way, but not naturally having these features makes it complicated."
"There could be more AI features included in the product."
"Fortinet FortiSIEM could improve to extend to several locations or sites."
"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."
"The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting."
"The inclusion of configuration management features and SIP links would improve this solution."
"I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like."
"It would be nice if I could easily select individual interfaces."
"I'd say the interface could improve a little bit. I find with new users, I tend to have to spend a bit of time walking them through how to use the interface. It could be a little more user friendly."
"I would like to have soft alarming. If an inner-base all of a sudden triggers a threshold, we have to rely on a lot of other tools and then we go into Statseeker to verify it. If Statseeker would confirm it preemptively and trigger it into our network panel, that would be nice."
"More private MIB object support, such as WAN optimisation performance and wireless, would be helpful."
Fortinet FortiSIEM is ranked 10th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 65 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. Fortinet FortiSIEM is rated 7.6, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSIEM writes "It's cheaper than other solutions with the same features but lacks integration with many third-party vendors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". Fortinet FortiSIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, Microsoft Sentinel and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Statseeker is most compared with . See our Fortinet FortiSIEM vs. Statseeker report.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.