We performed a comparison between Galvanize IncidentBond and IBM Resilient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."The customization and the transparency of data while still maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI, are key features. It allows for me, as an engineer, to evolve the individual components and modules, and to create a much more meaningful picture than the individual pieces in isolation ever could."
"The most valuable thing about it is how easy it is to navigate the user interface."
"As a whole, the product is stable...Technical support is very good."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The UBA, User Behavior Analytics, is very good."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"The solution is reliable in our usage."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The initial setup of IBM Resilient is not that complex since my company already has a support license that we use internally. In general, the product's deployment phase is not that complex."
"Stable – Release – Experimental" system with their releases, and all the proper checks and balances, I’d be an incredibly happy individual. I can appreciate the cause and affect, wherein the customization of the tool drives rapid release schedules, and the paradox that creates with the idea of stable releases. I’d also like more transparency about known bugs and issues."
"The product must provide more integration with other tools."
"The implementation could be a bit simpler."
"IBM Resilient could integrate better with my tools."
"The tool needs to improve its documentation on license scripts."
"The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions."
"Its price needs improvement."
"It is not very straightforward to set up custom integrations, especially with services like Azure. You need an additional server for integration."
"IBM Resilient is quite complex, including its configuration."
Earn 20 points
Galvanize IncidentBond is ranked 13th in Security Incident Response while IBM Resilient is ranked 4th in Security Incident Response with 17 reviews. Galvanize IncidentBond is rated 9.0, while IBM Resilient is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Galvanize IncidentBond writes "Customization and transparency of data, while maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Resilient writes "Simple deployment, scalable, but lacking third-party solution compatibility ". Galvanize IncidentBond is most compared with , whereas IBM Resilient is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, IBM Security QRadar and Fortinet FortiSOAR.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.