Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitLab Logo
9,416 views|7,647 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Jenkins Logo
6,536 views|5,610 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 30, 2023

We performed a comparison between Jenkins and Gitlab based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: For Jenkins, the initial configuration with Kubernetes can be clunky and requires third-party plugins. Maintenance is minimal. Installation on Windows is simple but not intuitive. GitLab's initial deployment is straightforward with clear fundamentals, and adoption requires education but is easy to implement.
  • Features: The most valuable aspect of Jenkins is pipeline customization, environment variables for flexible deployment, and seamless GitHub integration. GitLab provides a single platform for all activities including source code, build, test, and deployment management, with an established upgrade roadmap for the next few years.
  • Pricing: Jenkins offers a free, open-source version without specific support needs. Its licensing is renewed annually, and pricing is reasonable. GitLab offers three editions: free, premium, and ultimate, with a steeper price difference between premium and ultimate. GitLab does not have hidden costs.
  • Service and Support: For Jenkins, community support is extensive with a rich knowledge base. Technical support takes 24-48 hours to resolve issues. GitLab's customer service is helpful and responsive with a high rating.

Comparison Results: Based on the parameters we compared, GitLab comes out ahead of Jenkins. Our reviewers found that installation on Windows is not intuitive and its maintenance can be more demanding.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Jenkins Report (Updated: May 2024).
787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The code merging capability is something that we use very frequently.""I like that you can use GitLab as a double-sided solution for both DevOps and version management. It's a good product for working in these two areas, and the user interface makes it easy to understand.""A user friendly solution.""The most valuable features of GitLab are the CI/CD pipeline and code management.""CI/CD is valuable for me.""GitLab is very well-organized and easy to use. Also, it offers most features that customers need.""The most valuable feature of GitLab is its security.""The most valuable feature of GitLab is the automatic merging of code."

More GitLab Pros →

"GitHub linking is pretty good. We have a deployment application where we can run our tests and add various variables to be passed as assertions to those tests. This is pretty fluid with Jenkins.""Jenkins is very easy to use.""Jenkins can be used for elastic management, if you have any sensitive data or credentials you can use them across the environment. Additionally, the solution is easy to use and can be used across multiple use cases.""Different types of jobs, such as Pipeline, Build, Freestyle, Maven, etc.""When we have manual tasks, we have to depend on multiple technical teams. With Jenkins, we can bring all the technologies together by the click of a button. We can see results without having to depend on different teams. Jenkins makes life easy for the database and DevOps teams.""I am not aware of the available options in the market right now compared to Jenkins, but I am pretty much happy with the service that Jenkins is providing our company.""The deployment of traditional Jenkins is easy.""It is very useful for us to be able to collect and manage automatic processing pipelines."

More Jenkins Pros →

Cons
"We'd always like to see better pricing on the product.""It is a little complex to set up the pipelines within the solution.""GitLab can improve by integrating with more tools, such as servers with Docker.""I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities.""I would like to see static analysis also embedded in GitLab. That would also help us. If there's something that it does internally by GitLab and then that is already tied up with your pipeline and then it can tell you that you're coding is good or your code is not great. Based on that, it would pass or fail. That should be streamlined. I would think that would help to a greater extent, in terms of having one solution rather than depending on multiple vendors.""The solution does not have many built-in functions or variables so scripting is required.""The price of GitLab could improve, it is high.""There is a need to improve or adopt AI into the ecosystem like a co-pilot, which Microsoft has done with GitHub."

More GitLab Cons →

"The solution could improve by having more advanced integrations.""Jenkins relies on the old version of interface for configuration management. This needs improvement.""It can be improved by including automated mobile reporting integrations.""Jenkins is not an easy solution to use and the configuration is not simple. They can improve the solution by adding a graphical interface that is more user-friendly.""The UI of Jenkins could improve.""I think an integrated help button, that respected the context of the change/work in hand, would be a worthwhile improvement.""The support for the latest Java Runtime Environment should be improved.""We would like to see the addition of mobile simulators support to this solution, as part of its open-source offering. We currently have to carry out manual testing for these platforms."

More Jenkins Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
  • "The price is okay."
  • "It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
  • "Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
  • "It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
  • "I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
  • "We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
  • "The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."
  • More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is a free product."
  • "Jenkins is open source."
  • "​It is free.​"
  • "Some of the add-ons are too expensive."
  • "It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."
  • "I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."
  • "Jenkins is open source and free."
  • "There is no cost. It is open source."
  • More Jenkins Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis nowadays. The biggest difference upon initial inspection is that TeamCity is far more focused on validating individual commits rather than certain types of tests. Jenkins’ front page presents information that is simply not useful in a non-linear development environment, where people are often working in vastly different directions. How many of the previous tests passed/failed is not really salient information in this kind of situation. Running specific tests for individual commits on TeamCity is far more trivial in terms of interface complexity than Jenkins. TeamCity just involves clicking the ”…” button in the corner on any test type (although I wish it wasn’t so easy to click “Run” by accident). I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins out of the box. There’s a point at which you feel that if you have to scour the documentation to do anything remotely complex in an application, you’re dealing with a bad interface. One disappointing thing in both is that inter-branch merges improperly trigger e-mails to unrelated committers. I suppose it is fairly difficult to determine who to notify about failure in situations like these, though. It seems like TeamCity pulls up the… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.
    Top Answer:For small-scale usage, GitLab offers a free tier. For enterprise pricing, GitLab is more expensive than GitHub, as it's not as widely adopted. GitLab is the preferred choice for many developers… more »
    Top Answer:I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities. Better integration and usability within the pipeline could make a significant… more »
    Top Answer:When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very easy… more »
    Top Answer:Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 42 in Build Automation
    Views
    9,416
    Comparisons
    7,647
    Reviews
    48
    Average Words per Review
    409
    Rating
    8.6
    2nd
    out of 42 in Build Automation
    Views
    6,536
    Comparisons
    5,610
    Reviews
    37
    Average Words per Review
    382
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Compared 50% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Veracode logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    IBM Rational Build Forge logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Harness logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Fuzzit
    Learn More
    Overview

    GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster. 

    It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring. 

    With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

    Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

    Sample Customers
    1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
    Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization26%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm34%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Media Company9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise34%
    Large Enterprise51%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitLab vs. Jenkins
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Jenkins and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitLab is ranked 1st in Build Automation with 70 reviews while Jenkins is ranked 2nd in Build Automation with 83 reviews. GitLab is rated 8.6, while Jenkins is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jenkins writes "A highly-scalable and stable solution that reduces deployment time and produces a significant return on investment". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, SonarQube, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline and Veracode, whereas Jenkins is most compared with Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline, IBM Rational Build Forge, Harness and Tekton. See our GitLab vs. Jenkins report.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.