We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and Oracle Cloud Platform based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Google Cloud slightly nudges ahead of Oracle Cloud Platform in this comparison. Google Cloud is very flexible, user friendly, and widely acknowledged. Users feel Oracle Cloud Platform is lacking some basic features and currently offers a very small portfolio.
"It is seamlessly integrated with your Android. There’s no fuss, no hassle."
"The most valuable features of Google Cloud Storage are flexibility and sustainability."
"It's simple to use."
"It’s very stable."
"I have more than enough personal storage and have had no security issues."
"Google Cloud Storage performs well and it's easy to use."
"It is stable and scalable."
"We are mostly doing telephony and generic web services in the telephony."
"The solution is user-friendly and integrates easily with web apps."
"The most significant aspect of Microsoft Azure File Storage is its life cycle functionality, which enables us to transfer files to various storage options, such as hot storage, full storage, and archive. This feature is crucial since we can apply a life cycle method to files that have not been in use for an extended period, and then move them to a cheaper cold storage option to save costs. Since the newest files are stored in the hot storage, it met our specific requirements. Consequently, older files can be transferred to archive and cold storage."
"The product is a reliable cloud solution."
"First of all, the solution is very secure. Secondly, the solution is very fast. It is reliable and available all the time."
"Its simplicity of use is most valuable. It's easy to start working with it and understand it. It's easier to transfer files between different users. I'm able to move files from my device to my manager's device without any issues or without facing any problems in between."
"It is a scalable product since it is a cloud solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable aspect of Azure File Storage is that all the features are available in one place."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure File Storage is the cloud file storage capability."
"User management could be better. It's complicated process to delete users and maintain the structure of documents created by deleted users."
"It is hard to migrate to another product if we want to."
"When compared to one of its competitors, Google Cloud Storage does not have or offer a lot of services to its users. So, this is one of the downsides of the solution."
"Google Cloud Storage could improve the integrations in a way Microsoft Azure is going about it. For Data Lake integrations, Microsoft Azure has a bunch of native pipelines available. All Google needs to do is add the same set or maybe even improve on the sets that they have. All the analytics, including the Data Lake, would then be able to sit in Google Cloud Storage."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"It is stable, but it can always be more stable."
"A lower cost, lower-end solution for a shared file system is missing."
"The solution must provide some accessibility features."
"The integration of the site storage with SQL was not completely seamless."
"If the file is large, there may be a delay in download time."
"It’s a challenge to find the right support person."
"The support could improve."
"A lot of things could be better, especially when it comes to accessing File Storage for monitoring. Azure Copy is fine, but there could be additional integration and security features for those who want more privacy and control over access to Azure."
"The security could always be modernized."
"It's not very intuitive."
"The product’s pricing could be better."
Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 66 reviews while Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 44 reviews. Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8, while Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Google Workspace and Amazon S3, whereas Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Wasabi, Amazon S3 Glacier and Oracle Database Backup Service. See our Google Cloud Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
