• Home
  • Greenqloud qstack vs. HPE Eucalyptus

Greenqloud qstack vs HPE Eucalyptus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
IBM Turbonomic
Read 204 IBM Turbonomic reviews
5,386 views|2,494 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
NetApp Logo
Greenqloud qstack
54 views|24 comparisons
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
HPE Eucalyptus
Read 2 HPE Eucalyptus reviews
368 views|169 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Management
May 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Greenqloud qstack and HPE Eucalyptus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
Download the complete report
786,117 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Dan Ambrose
Helps visibility, bridges the data gap, and frees up time
We use IBM Turbonomic in a hybrid cloud environment. Although it supports multi-cloud capabilities, we currently operate in a single-cloud setting.... Read more →
Use Greenqloud qstack?
HiranthaWijayawardena
Good interface, and an easy initial setup with good community support on the free version
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We felt the pricing was very fair for the product. It is in no way prohibitive for larger deployments, unlike other similar product on the market."
  • "Contact the Turbonomic sales team, explain your needs and what you're looking to monitor. They will get a pre-sales SE on the phone and together work up a very accurate quote."
  • "What I can advise is to trial the product, taking advantage of the Turbonomic pre-sales implemention support and kickstart training."
  • "Licensing is per socket, so load up on the cores rather than a lot of lower core CPUs."
  • "You should understand the cost of your physical servers and how much time and money you are spending year over year on expanding your virtual farm."
  • "Price is a big one. VMTurbo was very competitively priced."
  • "If you're a super-small business, it may be a little bit pricey for you... But in large, enterprise companies where money is, maybe, less of an issue, Turbonomic is not that expensive. I can't imagine why any big company would not buy it, for what it does."
  • "It was an annual buy-in. You basically purchase it based on your host type stuff. The buy-in was about 20K, and the annual maintenance is about $3,000 a year."

    • More IBM Turbonomic Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    786,117 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?
    Top Answer:I have not seen Turbonomic's new pricing since IBM purchased it. When we were looking at it in my previous company… more »
    Read all 17 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Turbonomic?
    Top Answer:I would like Turbonomic to add more services, especially in the cloud area. I have already told them this. They can add… more »
    Read all 24 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?
    Top Answer:I mostly provide it to my clients. There are multiple reasons why they would use it depending on the client's needs and… more »
    Read all 26 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What are the pros and cons of VMware vSphere vs Rackspace OpenStack vs HP...
    Top Answer:The best cloud platform for your organization will depend on specific needs and requirements, but below are the… more »
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager
    Eucalyptus, HP Eucalyptus
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    NetApp
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise
    Interactive Demo
    IBM
    Watch a demo
    NetApp
    Demo Not Available
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise
    Demo Not Available
    Overview

    IBM Turbonomic is a performance and cost optimization platform for public, private, and hybrid clouds used by customers to assure application performance while eliminating inefficiencies by dynamically resourcing applications through automated actions. Common use cases include cloud cost optimization, cloud migration planning, data center modernization, FinOps acceleration, Kubernetes optimization, sustainable IT, and application resource management. Turbonomic customers report an average 33% reduction in cloud and infrastructure waste without impacting application performance, and return-on-investment of 471% over three years. Ready to take a closer look? Explore the interactive demo or start your free 30-day trial today!

    Qstack is a comprehensive cloud management platform that makes it easy to deploy a private, hybrid, or public cloud. Built to be compatible, Qstack is able to run on any commodity hardware and is hypervisor-agnostic, giving companies the flexibility to employ what’s best suited for their infrastructure needs, without being locked into a specific vendor.

    HP Eucalyptus helps customers grow revenue and stay ahead of competition by enabling developers to get the IT resources they need in seconds, not days. Its unique AWS compatibility ensures applications are easily deployed in private, public or hybrid cloud environments.
    Sample Customers
    IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.
    Advania, HP, CB Technologies Inc., Redapt Engineering Co Ltd, vmware
    Mosaik Solutions, Nava Solutions
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company6%
    No Data Available
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise70%
    No Data Available
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Management
    May 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: May 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    786,117 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Greenqloud qstack is ranked 73rd in Cloud Management while HPE Eucalyptus is ranked 38th in Cloud Management. Greenqloud qstack is rated 0.0, while HPE Eucalyptus is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Eucalyptus writes "Good interface, and an easy initial setup with good community support on the free version". Greenqloud qstack is most compared with , whereas HPE Eucalyptus is most compared with .

    See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.