We performed a comparison between HPE Ezmeral Container Platform and Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management."If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."
"The operating system has a live update and is more secure than any other. It's made for Atomic OS, a lightweight OS new to the market. I also like the source-to-image capabilities. The customer can directly deploy their applications from the repository. It's a highly flexible and easy way to deploy into production."
"On OpenShift, it's easy to scale applications. We can easily scale up or scale down."
"The most valuable feature is that the solution can be deployed in the cloud which removes the expense of a server."
"The auto scalability feature, which is based on smart agendas, determined from pre-prepared rules is the most valuable feature. You can also create different routes for deployment. Deployment types can be provided with an identifier, such as an ARB deployment. This really helped in rolling out releases without disrupting services for the end-users."
"The solution is stable. However, it depends on the integrations of the solution on how stable it will be, such as what tools you integrate with."
"The banking transactions, inquiries, and account opening have been the most valuable."
"The usability and the developer experience. The platform has a centralized consultant that is easy to use for our development, operations and security teams."
"The tool's most valuable features include high availability, scalability, and security. Other features like advanced cluster management, advanced cluster security, and Red Hat Quay make it powerful for businesses. It also comes with features like OpenShift Virtualization."
"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."
"It is difficult to deploy the OpenShift cluster in a bare-metal environment."
"One area for improvement is that we can't currently run Docker inside a container, as it clashes with security consents. It would be good if we could change that."
"The complexity of the installation could be reduced. While we got the necessary support, the instructions could be clearer."
"Things are there and the documentation is there, however, there still needs to be quick guides available."
"OpenShift Container Platform needs to work on integrations."
"The solution does not work on a route-wise NFS."
"The solution needs to introduce open ID connect integration for role-based access control."
"The stability needs improvement."
More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is ranked 17th in Container Management while Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is ranked 1st in Container Management with 39 reviews. HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is rated 7.0, while Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Ezmeral Container Platform writes "Easy to install with good support, but the deployment of applications could be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform writes "Provides automation that speeds up our process by 30% and helps us achieve zero downtime". HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is most compared with Kubernetes, Amazon EKS, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Google Kubernetes Engine and Docker, whereas Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is most compared with Amazon EKS, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Amazon Elastic Container Service and Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.