We performed a comparison between IBM Integration Bus and JBoss ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The message queue feature is very valuable."
"It is one of the most stable products which I have seen in the market."
"What I like best are the monitoring features."
"The most valuable features of the IBM Integration Bus are flexibility. It's also an alternative for integrating it with other projects, which we are not ready at this time to do, such as switching to tunnels. The tunnels would be used with other partners to make sure everything is secured."
"It can be implemented as an enterprise service bus to seamlessly connect all applications within your enterprise."
"The most valuable features of the IBM Integration Bus are the flexibility to easily integrate with other solutions, such as SAP or any other vendors."
"I consider the solution to be one of the most stable in the market."
"The solution is stable and can scale relatively easily."
"The solution is very easy to use. I can download the trial version and just give it a go."
"I would rate the support from IBM Integration Bus a seven out of ten. They are very helpful but sometimes it takes too long for them to respond."
"Recently, there was a lot of instability when selecting the solution they needed for testing."
"Its licensing or subscription model should be improved for more flexible adoption. There should also be more ease of use."
"We decided to move away from IBM Integration Bus for IT technical refreshments."
"The price could be better. It would also be better if they simplified the code."
"Licensing is too high. It is quite expensive."
"The tracing and debugging features are not up to date with more modern technology available."
"Some of the runtime properties need to be improved because if you want to load certificates as sales security, you have to restart the server."
"The EPA, from what I understand, lacks a lot of features and it doesn't really know how to interface with legacy systems or how to develop APIs for legacy systems."
Earn 20 points
IBM Integration Bus is ranked 1st in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 65 reviews while JBoss ESB is ranked 14th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). IBM Integration Bus is rated 8.0, while JBoss ESB is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "Scalable solution with efficient integration features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JBoss ESB writes "Easy to use with flexible pricing, but needs more flexibility surrounding integrations". IBM Integration Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Service Bus, IBM WebSphere Message Broker and Fiorano ESB, whereas JBoss ESB is most compared with Mule ESB, Red Hat Fuse, Oracle Service Bus and webMethods Integration Server.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.