We performed a comparison between Icinga and ServiceNow IT Operations Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have found the solution to be stable."
"The value of Icinga is that it has hundreds of plugins, so it's really easy to monitor pretty much anything."
"There's a module called Icinga Director, which helps us configure the product using an intuitive interface through clicks instead of creating a text configuration. It's very helpful for us."
"It is really easy in Icinga to create your own plugin and integrate it without any fuss. And it works just perfectly fine."
"The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first."
"The drafts are easy but what I like about Icinga is that there are many add-ons that you can download."
"The apply rules feature saves a lot of time."
"An affordable solution for small organizations to do basic network monitoring."
"The most valuable features of ServiceNow IT Operations Management are ease of use, intuitive design, and ease of management, and its based on IT practices which are good."
"As a product, ServiceNow IT Operations Management is pretty strong, and it can discover non-IP devices."
"It helps streamline management and processes."
"The most valuable feature of ServiceNow IT Operations Management is the user interface."
"The way this solution has helped us is that it improved our communication."
"The end-to-end ticketing process is most valuable in ServiceNow IT Operations Management because its notification feature is excellent in keeping all users informed on the next step compared to BMC. I also like that ServiceNow IT Operations Management is very user-friendly."
"From my perspective as an asset manager, the most valuable feature of the solution is the configuration management portion, where I can actively add something to the database."
"I like the tool's CMBD connection with Discovery. The solution is also flexible."
"I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built."
"We have found some problems with Nagios, and support isn't very responsive."
"Icinga is a complex solution that's hard to learn. It's a powerful product for monitoring, but new users will have a hard time figuring out what to do."
"It needs Trap SNMP. I saw the documentation for Zabbix, that it has its own built-in product which handles SNMP traps, and there's nothing similar in Icinga or Nagios. I think this feature is most important for me."
"There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved."
"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."
"The user interface should be improved."
"One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine."
"There is a slower learning curve associated with the tool's scripting part. It is also not cheap."
"If you are new to using the solution, you will find the setup complex."
"The service discovery tool should include HR automations that automatically remove an employee who is leaving."
"The pricing of some modules is higher because they are sold in packages. If we need something specific, we cannot take it individually."
"The pattern part can be improved. Patterns are used in the Discovery feature. Although it is easy to create new patterns and modify the existing ones, it would be better if this solution can have more out-of-the-box patterns. In terms of new features, they can include artificial intelligence, something like machine learning."
"ServiceNow could be more prescriptive on how customers can leverage some of the benefits."
"The tool can be improved by including more detailed information to assist new users."
"The setup and deployment could be simplified, and the pricing could improve."
More ServiceNow IT Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Icinga is ranked 21st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 17 reviews while ServiceNow IT Operations Management is ranked 8th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 35 reviews. Icinga is rated 7.6, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Icinga writes "A stable, scalable and cost-effective solution that helps with inbuilt scripts for easy modification". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow IT Operations Management writes "A very capable solution that includes a valuable, user-friendly workflow management tool". Icinga is most compared with Zabbix, Checkmk, Nagios Core, Nagios XI and Netdata, whereas ServiceNow IT Operations Management is most compared with OpsRamp, Moogsoft, Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence), Datadog and BMC TrueSight Operations Management. See our Icinga vs. ServiceNow IT Operations Management report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.